The ramblings of an Eternal Student of Life
. . . still studying and learning how to live

Latest Rambling Thoughts:
 
Thursday, November 7, 2013
Current Affairs ... Technology ...

I’m seeing a lot written these days about “Big Data”. I’m not fully versed with it yet, but the concept seems to be grounded in the fact that many people today (especially younger people) put a whole lot of info about themselves on the Internet via social network sites, and through buying stuff on-line, banking on-line, and doing business with government agencies. And there are even more data sources, especially the smartphone: it monitors your calls, figures out your location with GPS locators, and otherwise snitches on what you are doing to some central command, like it or not. Furthermore, businesses (and even government agencies, albeit slowly) do more and more of their business via on-line mechanisms, exposing themselves to data collection.

All of this has not gone unnoticed by the big communications companies and web site corporations (Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc.); they are compiling huge databases with extremely detailed info about the day to day doings of individuals and corporate entities. And it’s not like all of these databases with all kinds of private information about almost everyone get used only by the compiling company or agency; they put this info out there for sale, so that the info gets amalgamated into mega-databases.

Obviously, a lot of people get upset about erosion of privacy due to these big databases. But a lot of young people don’t seem particularly worried; there seems to be a digital communalism amidst the Millennials, a hazy, idealistic belief on their part that modern communications technology is creating a close-knit feeling of goodwill that is spreading to all corners of the human race. Well, good luck with that; I remember when people my age believed in “Woodstock Nation”. And then we were flung into the adult world, with jobs, mortgages, families, and lots of worries about getting by.

But back to Big Data and digital idealism; a lot of people, not necessarily all idealistic 20-somethings, believe that Big Data can be used for good. It can help to see bad things coming such as epidemics, crime waves and economic bubbles / financial crises. My question is, just who is monitoring these databases for this; most governments or educational institutions aren’t going to pay for access to them (too expensive), so it will be mostly private corporations that detect the “bad waves”. Will they be nice enough to tap on the shoulders of the public agencies that could do something about it (or at least get ready to mop up the damage)? We shall see, this is all pretty new.

Scientific American has been running a variety of articles in recent issues about Big Data issues. The November, 2013 issue had a good article on the dark side of Big Data (“How To Think About Privacy” by Jaron Lanier). The author made a very interesting point about how Big Data analysis can cause trouble for society. He notes that “the traditional entertaining way to tell a cautionary science-fiction tale is to conjure an evil villain who becomes all-powerful.” E.g. we can imagine a huge international corporation that has more power than any government and thus starts planning and directing everyone’s lives; or we can imagine a techno-facist strongman government playing the 1984 role of “big brother”. (Orwell’s 1984 might finally be realized, about 40 years late).

But, as Lanier points out, the more immediate danger from big analysis of big data seems to be coming from incompetent bungling on the part of business capitalists. Lanier gives two good examples of how businesses have used big data over the past decade or so to increase their profits, while inadvertently causing back-fire effects that eventually made things worse for these businesses; and at the same time caused a lot of social misery on the part of many everyday people. The first example regards the “massive statistical calculations that allowed American health insurance companies to avoid insuring high-risk customers.” It worked for a while as to increase the profitability of the insurance industry. But the managers and geeks who set up these computer routines did not ask what effect their new policies would eventually have on society and on their employers. They assumed that there would not be any “blowback”.

But it turned out that society didn’t like the way that insurance companies were enforcing increasingly aggressive and preemptive “high-risk lifestyle / pre-existing condition ” limitations, not at all; and so eventually the political world responded. I.e., Obamacare came into being; and now the federal government is deeply involved with how every one of us will gain access to medical care, and how every health care provider and insurance company will provide insurance and care, and pay or be paid for it. And the jury is still out whether the cure itself is going to be worse than the disease.

The second example is even bigger and even more obvious. Yes, the 2008 financial crisis and the Great Recession that followed it was triggered by a lot of smart analysts and sharp business managers applying lots of analytical fire-power to crunch lots of data. As a result, they came up with really innovative ways to squeeze a lot of profit out of the mortgage lending market. And darn if it didn’t work and work well for a decade or so. Furthermore, unlike the experience of health insurance companies with their high-risk customer limitations, the public also liked what was happening. Many families that could never expect to get the financing to buy their own homes were now in the real estate game. It seemed like a win-win.

But eventually, certain actors in the system started adapting their behaviors to the new realities, while others didn’t; and so the economic feedback started to turn negative. Housing price increases couldn’t go on forever; at some point, individual buyers and financing entities started pulling back a bit. This little slow-down soon caused housing prices to peak and then even start declining. The business models and financing procedures in place did not anticipate this. And so that little tip set off a chain reaction that resulted in huge economic losses over the next 5 years (the so-called “GDP output gap”; and we’re still not completely out of it — the American economy will not be back to its full production potential for at least another 3 years). People lost their homes and jobs, and many of them still haven’t regained the living standards that they had up thru 2008. All because of what turned out to be a short-sighted application of big data by big business.

So what is the takeaway here? Are we threatened mostly by capitalism’s short-sighted and incompetent use of big data? These two stories seem to point in that direction. But then again, government is always a bit behind the private sector in terms of technology use. Big government is only getting started with big data. And Obamacare seems to be where it will first have a big role in directing a major national program, because big data gathering and analysis is crucial to the agencies and mechanisms set up by the Affordable Care Act to control medical costs, along with the monitoring of compliance by insurance companies and health care providers with all of the complex regulations and provisions of the Act.

Governments around the world do NOT have an unblemished track-record in terms of successfully carrying out major social programs. And many if not most of these failures are not due to evil totalitarian schemes such as fascism or corrupted socialism, nor by pure incompetence in execution. Many of the big flops (in both the US and abroad) are caused by unexpected blowback, unanticipated consequences run amok. There is a fairly popular book out now called “Seemingly Like A State” by James Scott, which provides a list of cautionary tales regarding well-intended and not-so-well-intended big government initiatives (often involving central planning and social engineering) that melted down and made things worse for the populace. The world often turns out to be much more complex, chaotic and unpredictable than the central planners believe – regardless of the good or bad intentions of those planners. And big data / big analysis will not turn out to be the cure for this, no more than it was the “cure” for the stodgy, conservative market for home mortgages that arose after WW2 (hey, remember Jimmy Stewart and It’s A Wonderful Life – back when there were still some human values in the home finance system, or so we had hoped!).

Obviously, President Obama and his top staff know about all this and are mustering all the wisdom they can garner in order to prevent Obamacare from melting down and becoming the next chapter of some future edition of this book. Or so I hope!

◊   posted by Jim G @ 8:38 pm      
 
 


  1. Jim, So now “they” are using the term “Big Data” for what seems to be “lack of privacy”. Or maybe I’m missing something. A couple (or three) of things come to mind here, and I’m trying to figure out if there’s a connection between them.

    The lack of privacy does not really surprise me at all; I do not find it a “recent” phenomenon – and I have a reason for that. Almost 30 years ago I had a cancer and soon after I had treatment I found I was receiving petitions asking for contributions to various cancer-concerned (so to say) organizations. In fact, I remember being specifically mentioned as “having had cancer yourself”, etc. I found myself wondering at that time: Just where and how did this private medical information become available for these groups asking me for contributions to their various causes, albeit they were cancer causes? The only thing I could think of was that either my insurance, the hospital, or doctors had given out my name. (My “bet” was on the insurance company.) And need I mention that these petitions have continued over these almost 30 years. So in a sense, there’s nothing new here.

    Then too there was the time, again some 30+ years ago, when I tho’t it apropos to have a discussion in class on privacy and/or the loss of it. I expected the students to be caught up in a big discussion – and this was a group I considered thoughtful and involved in discussions in class; but “privacy” – big yawn! The students seemed to have cared less about the loss of privacy in society – and that was 30 some years ago.

    So I wonder, is the problem one that is massively getting worse due to the technology of today? Warnings are going out to parents and teens and tweens to be careful of what they put on the Internet as it will stay there forever. Hardly a day goes by that there’s not someone bemoaning the fact that pictures of some kind surfaced and cost one a job or something one said and published on the Internet cost one a job.

    I tend to think that it’s *not* so much the idea that Millennials have a “hazy, idealistic belief” that a “close-knit feeling of goodwill” will result; rather I tend to think that it’s a matter of not thinking farther than their nose, not thinking of the consequences of their actions. Least of all, do I think that Millennials are worried about tracking “epidemics, crime waves and economic bubble/financial crises.”

    I am coming to the conclusion that too many people are becoming very used to being caught on camera, having their every moment tracked by government. As someone said to me the other day, shocked that I seemed not to know it: “*Everyone* wants to be on TV.” And I think this whole “camera friendly” society is worse in Europe than it is here in the U.S., although we here now have “traffic cameras” to ticket people who go through intersections where there are a lot of accidents; and these cameras end up being used, as other data is used, for other purposes.

    As to the whole “big brother” aspect of “Big Data”: It seems to me that it’s well on its way to tracking the movements of individuals the world over. (In fact, I find myself thinking that the TV program “Person of Interest” may not be as far- fetched as it seems to be; perhaps it’s right on the mark.)

    On a tangential note: I just read a review of a book by Donna Freitas, “The End of Sex: How Hookup Culture Is Leaving a Generation Unhappy, Sexually Unfulfilled, and Confused about Intimacy.” The title about says everything that the book has to say, it seems; the book at least is asking the questions that no one seems to even consider in their wildest dreams. So it seems that even in what should be a very intimate encounter, such intimacy is sorely lacking for the young generation(s); yet although it is being sought so voraciously, it’s not being found today. If Millennials cannot “get it together” in what should be very intimate situations, they hardly are thinking about who is doing what with their phone calls, Facebook page information, etc.

    And perhaps there’s something I do not understand here, but it also seems to me that Big Data and/or Big Brother are already doing just fine in our society. In fact, it seems to me that they already have a solid base in our government. Several times now I’ve heard political commentators mention that our Congress, in particular, no longer has the interests of those who elected them to office at heart; but they now “work” for the big money interests represented by the lobbyists.

    And, while the lobbyists in Congress may not be blatantly noticeable to the American public, obvious evidence of that accountability to big money is that the night Romney lost the election he had to account to the big spenders (!) for his campaign, much to his embarrassment.

    As to all the problems with Obamacare: I read recently (don’t ask me where as I have forgotten; I’m not sure if I read so many things I can’t keep track of what I read where or if I’m simply getting old and some things are beginning to elude me, but I digress. . .) that when Medicare was signed into law in 1965 similar (yet different in their way, the technology was different in Lyndon Johnson’s time) problems with it arose as have arisen with Obamacare. There was a great hoopla about it “never working”, etc. Yet, here we are less 50 years later and it seems to be working just fine – or working, at least. (And, again tangentially, doesn’t it seem that Medicare should be much older? Perhaps it’s just me.)

    I find myself wondering if the *real* issue here will end up being a “step up” in the evolution of the human race. For instance, will the issue of lack of privacy, at some point, finally become a serious problem for those who seem to find it a non-issue now? Will this mean a psychological and emotional growth of the human race where privacy and intimacy become treasured and sought after, rather than thrown away these days, by the young people especially, in their search for them? MCS

    Comment by Mary — November 8, 2013 @ 3:24 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment:


   

FOR MORE OF MY THOUGHTS, CHECK OUT THE SIDEBAR / ARCHIVES
To blog is human, to read someone's blog, divine
NEED TO WRITE ME? eternalstudent404 (thing above the 2) gmail (thing under the >) com

www.eternalstudent.com - THE SIDEBAR - ABOUT ME - PHOTOS - RSS FEED - Atom
 
OTHER THOUGHTFUL BLOGS:
 
Church of the Churchless
Clear Mountain Zendo, Montclair
Fr. James S. Behrens, Monastery Photoblog
Of Particular Significance, Dr. Strassler's Physics Blog
My Cousin's 'Third Generation Family'
Weather Willy, NY Metro Area Weather Analysis
Spunkykitty's new Bunny Hopscotch; an indefatigable Aspie artist and now scolar!

Powered by WordPress