Politics ... Society ...
There’s an interesting article by political analyst Jay Cost on Real Clear Politics about how Barack Obama and other prominent Democratic leaders have “ruined” the Democratic Party through patronage. In a nutshell, Mr. Cost and his recent book (“Spoiled Rotten”) contend that the Democrats were founded in the 1820s by Andrew Jackson as the “party of the common person”. Over the years, the Democratic Party has wandered far from this mission, especially in the years leading up to the Civil War, when the Democrats allied themselves strongly with the industrial interests, plantation owners and social groups who wanted to preserve and expand the institution of slavery. However, in the 20th Century, Woodrow Wilson started a trend to move the Democrats back towards the interests of the average Jane and Joe. This trend was put on hold in the “Roaring 20’s”, but came into full flower in the 1930s with Franklin D. Roosevelt and his efforts to fight the Great Depression.
Mr. Cost explains that FDR’s successors did a pretty good job of keeping the Dems centered on what we today call “the 99 percent” –all 99 of it, not certain segments. However, after Lyndon Johnson “lost the South” to the GOP by (rightly) pushing rights laws into being, the Democrats had to start specializing. Many of the “average Joe and Janes” that were once its main constituency were won over by Nixon and then Ronald Reagan. This happened for a variety of reasons, including distaste for forced minority integration and protections, and the perception that the Dems were sympathetic to the hippies and draft dodgers from the Vietnam war days. The Democrats could no longer win just by defending the economic interests of the masses; as Thomas Frank pointed out in “What’s The Matter With Kansas“, a lot of common men and women have been voting against their material well-being by supporting conservative GOP candidates.
Thus, in order to keep itself in contention, the Dems increasingly had to pander to (or “serve the needs of”, depending on your viewpoint) certain interests that were not embraced by a majority of Americans. These include gay rights, feminism, environmental activism, » continue reading …