The ramblings of an Eternal Student of Life     
. . . still studying and learning how to be grateful and make the best of it
 
 
Thursday, October 14, 2010
Economics/Business ... Politics ...

The USA is experiencing some bad economic times, and everyone wonders where things are going. In order to get some sense of where we’re headed, I am going to review where our economy has been in recent years. So here goes; perhaps is will point where the road seems to be leading. If I’m right, we may be heading for the New Middle Ages.

Between 1945 and 1975, the US economy experienced a tremendous boom because of a tremendous boon; i.e., most of the factories in Europe and Japan were devastated. By comparison, the US had built up a huge industrial factory base during the WW1 and WW2 efforts, and this was fully intact and fairly modern (relative to the 1950s, anyway). Energy was cheap; oil and gas were available from US soil and were plentiful. Major discoveries soon happened in Arabia that made things even better.

The USA was by far the most developed industrial nation just after WW2. Great Britain and the Soviet Union were recovering relatively quickly,  »  continue reading …

◊   posted by Jim G @ 8:06 pm       Read Comment (1) / Leave a Comment
 
 
Monday, October 11, 2010
Aspergers ... Brain / Mind ... Personal Reflections ...

There’s a nice article in the October Atlantic Magazine about Donald Triplett, the first human being diagnosed with autism. This is a well written article containing a very edifying human interest story; but most important (to me, anyway), it provides a valuable perspective on just what we do and do not know about autism. Bottom line here: we’re still not really sure just what autism is, despite all of the pontifications by the medical and psychological sciences pretending to have strict definitions and diagnostic tools. At bottom, “we know autism when we see it”.

Over the past year or so, I have ‘studied up’ on the question of Aspergers Syndrome and the dreaded “autism spectrum”. I have read articles and books, watched videos about autistic people, and have rubbed elbows with a group of young adults who identify themselves as “Aspies” or “high functioning autistics” (at a monthly Meet-Up group). Obviously I’m trying to learn more about myself, about where I fit in. Yes, I could pay a shrink a couple of thousand bucks to get a “professional diagnosis”, but I’d rather “take the journey” and save myself the grand or two.  »  continue reading …

◊   posted by Jim G @ 11:29 am       Read Comments (4) / Leave a Comment
 
 
Saturday, October 9, 2010
Current Affairs ... History ... Society ...

1.) Was the Vietnam war a mistake? It’s a question that still matters to us aging Baby Boomers. I had a thought on the subject the other day. It seems to me that there are wars that a nation has to fight. Those are the “holy wars”; where the other side is not just trying to plunder your bounty, but is trying to change your way of life. I.e., where the other side is trying to impose some sort of vision, be it religious (e.g. Christian or Islamic theocracy), or philosophic (e.g., Communist or Nazi fascist utopia). Whenever a nation or a tribe convinces itself that it has a plan for the world and that instituting that plan requires the use of firepower, about the only cure is to fight fire with fire. War is hell, but utopian visions that require belligerence are an even worse hell.

The USA fought the Vietnam war because it was trying to stop Soviet Russia from instituting its Marxist-Leninist vision, which indeed had been promulgated through the use of firepower and other belligerence. Was Vietnam really a Marxist holy war? It was being fought by Asian visionaries; but what was their vision? Did Ho Chi Minh want to see collective farming in California? It seems to me that the Viet Cong and the Vietnamese Communists were a bit more pragmatic and nationalistically inspired. From what little I know, the “eastern mind” is quite pragmatic. It doesn’t dwell on grand visions of how humankind should live their lives. This can be seen in the difference between Buddhism and the major western / middle-eastern faiths. (But admittedly, there are forms of dogmatic Buddhism, and Buddhist holy wars have been fought).

It’s too bad that Kennedy and Johnson and MacNamara and Rostow and Kissinger just couldn’t seem to grasp this.  »  continue reading …

◊   posted by Jim G @ 9:47 pm       Read Comment (1) / Leave a Comment
 
 
Sunday, October 3, 2010
Current Affairs ... Personal Reflections ... Society ...

As I get older, I give conservatives (the true conservatives, anyway) credit for putting emphasis on the notion of “values” and “virtues”. They have a point; no matter how good and effective the government is, no matter how extensive its social programs are, no matter how just and effectively enforced the laws are, a nation and the society within it will not hold together unless there are unwritten personal rules which everyone respects and plays by. That’s what values are all about; they are based around certain simple notions, such as the “Golden Rule”, and reflect many hundreds and thousands of years of accumulated wisdom passed on from generation to generation.

The conservatives complain that values aren’t holding up so well in present day America; we are trying to replace value-driven self-regulation with more and more programs and written regulations, and that is causing thing to go to hell. Well, I don’t entirely agree; but it is something to ponder.

In my pondering, I tried to think of some people from my youth (in the early 1960s, when values hadn’t yet declined too much yet according to some conservative thinkers) who truly lived “value-oriented” lives. People who could be called “the salt of the earth”. People who no one much noticed, but quietly did many tiny little things that collectively help keep life civilized. Yes, like the raindrops that collectively assemble themselves into rivers and oceans. I can think of many people from my family who were like that. But my memories of my parents, grandparents, aunts, uncles and other relatives is probably clouded by sentimentality, given how long they have been gone. So I have picked out a guy who was not a member of my family, but still impressed me and many others that I grew up with as a really good person.

That guy’s name was Rocco Locarro, Rocky as everyone called him (I have discussed him before on this blog). He was the janitor at McKenzie Elementary School  »  continue reading …

◊   posted by Jim G @ 4:45 pm       Read Comments (2) / Leave a Comment
 
 
Thursday, September 30, 2010
Science ...

Who is your favorite physicist? Most people don’t have one. Newton, Einstein, Maxwell, Hubble — great thinkers, but what’s the difference between them as human beings? They were all pretty nerdy, most likely.

Well, I happen to like modern science a whole lot, but up to now I never really thought much about who my favorite physicist would be. When you think about physics, you think about big abstract ideas, not about personalities and human struggles. But personalities and human struggles lie behind all that has been accomplished in our quest to understand the basic laws of the world that we inhabit and the universe that surrounds it. So here are some of my rough impressions regarding some noted physicists. I’m going to focus on the modern guys, as having seen them speaking on TV and read their words in magazines and knowing the times they live in, I have a better grounding in judging them as fellow travelers; versus say Marie Curie or Max Planck. This is not exactly going to be well researched, but for what it’s worth, here are my thoughts:

I have a lot of regard for Roger Penrose. Right now, he would have to be my favorite physicist  »  continue reading …

◊   posted by Jim G @ 8:54 pm       Read Comment (1) / Leave a Comment
 
 
Sunday, September 26, 2010
Economics/Business ... Society ...

I just updated the Poverty 101 page on my site to reflect the recently released 2009 update of the poverty level for the USA. My chart shows compares the poverty rate with real GDP per capita, since 1959. What it shows is this: over the past two years, the poverty level has started to climb again, homing in on the levels reached after the recessions of 1981 and 1991. GDP per capita has also gone down due to the “Great Recession”; the decline has been greater than for any other economic downturn occurring on the chart (i.e., since 1959).

Over the past 30 years, real GDP per person has climbed quite a bit, while the poverty rate has stayed within a fixed range, 12 to 15% (14.3% in 2009). So, economic growth has not been shared with the poorest segment of our society during this time (versus the 1960s and early 70s, when the poverty rate went from 22% to 12%). But since 1980 (when Ronald Reagan was elected, when manufacturing jobs rapidly started going overseas, and when the Baby Boomers came into authority), the poor and near-poor immediately feel the impact whenever there is an economic downturn. It’s basically a “heads I win, tails you lose” proposition for them.

There is an interesting article on the Smart Money web site questioning the relevance of the government’s GDP measure as an appropriate gauge for economic growth.  »  continue reading …

◊   posted by Jim G @ 7:03 pm       Read Comment (1) / Leave a Comment
 
 
Thursday, September 23, 2010
Personal Reflections ... Web Site/Blog ...

I usually develop ideas for this blog at odd moments throughout the day, and try to jot a line or two down on paper before I forget what inspired me. Later on I find some time to further develop that initial thought, usually while sitting in front of a keyboard and wanting to type something. Once I actually start typing, I start thinking more and more, and then more ideas come out. Thus, many of my blog entries start with short notions but become fairly long essays.

However, tonight I am going to avoid long essays and just put out a bit of the raw, untreated mental effluent that often becomes the feedstock for this blog. This is going to be quite Twitter-like, but that’s what the youth of America seem to want today. OK, here goes.

1.) So what about karma? Many if not most Buddhists believe that the goodness or badness of what you do in this life will affect some future person who will “reincarnate” something of your former being (even if they don’t have any memory of it).  »  continue reading …

◊   posted by Jim G @ 7:16 pm       Read Comments (2) / Leave a Comment
 
 
Sunday, September 19, 2010
Personal Reflections ... Photo ...

Morning glories in all of their glory on a September morn, near my apartment parking space.

The Buddha once taught a lesson by simply holding up a flower. That was one of his better lessons. The core teaching of Buddhism (the four noble truths) regards craving. Craving was said by the Buddha to be the cause of all suffering, and the cessation of craving can extinguish all suffering in this world. Sounds good, no?

Even though I am a loyal member of a Zen sangha, I disagree. Well, I partly disagree, anyway. Certainly, craving for material things and stimulating experiences and ego and comfort can cause much suffering; to both the person doing the craving, and all those who he or she will walk over to
satiate that craving. “Crave” implies an exaggerated, amped-up level of desire; gotta have it! Admittedly, craving is most of what is wrong with America today.

To crave something is to fixate the mind upon that thing, to ignore all else, to not balance out the goods and bads that come with any thing or experience. So, I certainly agree that materialistic or egotistical craving is a bad thing.

The four noble truths don’t stop with things and experiences, though. They push the concept all the way to life itself, to “existence” (and also “non-existence”). In that regard, I have to take exception. I think that it is natural to “crave existence”; I think that at heart, existence is good. There certainly are instances where it is noble to give up one’s life, one’s existence for the good of another (or many others, more likely). But those instances are relatively rare (thank goodness). In the 99.9% of the time when our existence does not get in the way of some greater good, I think it is good to “crave” one’s existence. It is even better if that craving leads us to a positive passion; e.g., the passion to be a musician, to be a writer, to raise one’s children well, to be a scientist, to start a successful business, to be an athlete, etc. Having a passion, at least a positive passion, can make life extremely rewarding.

But passion, even the most positive passion there is, can also make life extremely painful. To live to the fullest means risking and experiencing a lot of pain along the way. Perhaps it even means the pain of ultimate failure or rejection. The Buddha’s prescription to eliminate all suffering in life through the cessation of craving thus does not make sense to me, in this context. Buddhism seems to say to the aspiring young pianist or basketball player or science student that a calm apathetic life centered around meditation is best, as the enlightenment that it might bring will eventually overcome pain. Perhaps in a person’s later years, this makes sense (but even then, some may choose to “rage, rage against the dying of the light”).

But for young people, I would say: GO FOR IT. NO PAIN, NO GAIN. Leave the Buddhist navel-gazing (which I do most every day) for later in life, once all the pain you will experience can make more sense.

◊   posted by Jim G @ 6:51 pm       Read Comments (3) / Leave a Comment
 
 
Wednesday, September 15, 2010
Economics/Business ... Society ... Socrates Cafe ...

At the local Socrates Cafe meeting, the group recently discussed whether honesty is still the best policy. Almost everyone made the point that 100% honesty is not possible. Fine, said the fellow who proposed the topic. But the real question, he said, is whether honesty should be the preferred policy, the general rule to which exceptions will sometimes occur . . .

That idea sounded good to me; if you couldn’t trust anything you heard from anyone, social life would break down; civilized society would eventually collapse. There could be no schools, no economy, no employers, no government, no organizations of any sort (other than bands of thieves who know what to expect of each other).

Someone replied that truth is a luxury of an affluent society; poor people have to lie. What else can you expect?  »  continue reading …

◊   posted by Jim G @ 7:33 pm       Read Comment (1) / Leave a Comment
 
 
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Photo ... Society ...

I heard on the radio that it’s “Fashion Week” in New York City; which is some kind of publicity event to get people to buy fancy, expensive clothes, the kind they design and make so well in New York. I can’t get too excited about that; I’m just not a fashionable guy (neither can I afford that stuff!).

However, “fashion” is a strong sociological undercurrent, a reality of group-thinking which we are all influenced by. I think fashion is interesting, even if I don’t always agree with the latest fashion trends.

Take eye ware, for example. I’ve worn glasses most of my life (never wanted to fiddle with contact lenses; which themselves are a fashion). Other than allowing me to see things clearly, all I want in a pair of glasses is comfort and durability (and safety; I like the fact that a pair of glasses would come between my cornea and a rock flying thru the air).

But of course, there is a social effect called fashion that determines the shape and characteristics of the glasses that are available for purchase. Back in the 1970s and 80s, the fashion in eyeglasses went towards “aviators”, big lenses with a bar over the nosebridge. Then in the 1990s, it was round glasses; big round glasses. And then in the 2000’s it was small rectangular glasses.

So here’s a shot comparing the glasses I wore back in the 1990s, versus the pair I wear today. (I recently rounded up my old pairs as to donate them to the local Lions group for redistribution to the needy). Now, why do the four pairs of round glasses look so “unfashionable” today, when they were perfectly fine about 15 years ago? Just what re-wired our brains to think that the bottom pair has some quality that makes them superior to the four above it? Personally, I thought that the round glasses provided better vision field and more protection.

But, I don’t want to seem like a geek from the past. Like my dentist. I just visited my dentist for a check-up, and God bless him, he was wearing an old pair of big plastic aviators, like it was still 1987 or something. No Fashion Week for him!

◊   posted by Jim G @ 4:22 pm       Read Comments (3) / Leave a Comment
 
 
TOP PAGE - LATEST BLOG POSTS
« PREVIOUS PAGE -- NEXT PAGE (OLDER POSTS) »
FOR MORE OF MY THOUGHTS, CHECK OUT THE SIDEBAR / ARCHIVES
To blog is human, to read someone's blog, divine
NEED TO WRITE ME? eternalstudent404 (thing above the 2) gmail (thing under the >) com

www.jimgworld.com - THE SIDEBAR - ABOUT ME - PHOTOS
 
OTHER THOUGHTFUL BLOGS:
 
Church of the Churchless
Clear Mountain Zendo, Montclair
Fr. James S. Behrens, Monastery Photoblog
Of Particular Significance, Dr. Strassler's Physics Blog
Weather Willy, NY Metro Area Weather Analysis
Spunkykitty's new Bunny Hopscotch; an indefatigable Aspie artist and now scholar!

Powered by WordPress