{"id":205,"date":"2009-04-04T22:50:00","date_gmt":"2009-04-04T22:50:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/2009\/04\/04\/205\/"},"modified":"2014-09-06T15:14:11","modified_gmt":"2014-09-06T20:14:11","slug":"205","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/?p=205","title":{"rendered":"The GOP and Paul of Tarsus"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>THE REPUBLICANS AND SAINT PAUL (no, not their convention site last year): The biggest question for the pundits and political analysts right now is whether the Obama Revolution is for real. Is the USA swinging away from laissez-faire capitalism, international unilateralism and government enforcement of &#8220;traditional values&#8221;, towards Euro-cosmopolitianism, higher taxes and socialism-lite?  I am not ready yet to make a call on that one.  It&#8217;s still possible that Barack Obama&#8217;s election was more a combination of his own talents, the faults of his opponent, and the unique circumstances of the 2008 election (i.e. the financial and economic collapse of autumn), than a change in American political philosophy at large.  But then again, maybe things are going in a new direction. There are big demographic changes underway in the voting age population, changes which favor the Democrats.  Also, the recession \/ mini-depression that we will be dealing with over the next few years could have lasting effects on politics, a leftward impact, just as the Great Depression had in the 1930s.  <\/p>\n<p>The Republican conservatives, led by Rush Limbaugh, are carping day and night about Obama as the next Vladimir Lenin.  But thus far the public doesn&#8217;t seem to be buying it.  Joe the Plumber&#8217;s cries against creeping wealth re-distribution and central economic planning don&#8217;t seem to be getting much traction.<\/p>\n<p>If so, the GOP as we know it is in for several decades of eclipse.  It will become a minority party in the House and Senate, with only an occasional shot at the Presidency (e.g., if an especially skilled candidate comes along and a third party splits the Democrats; the inverse of Bill Clinton and Ross Perot in 1992).  <\/p>\n<p>That is, unless a St. Paul comes along within their ranks.<\/p>\n<p>I recently read and re-read an article about Paul of Tarsus in The Atlantic magazine.  It was by Robert Wright, entitled <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/doc\/200904\/globalization-religion\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;One World, Under God&#8221;<\/a>.   Wright&#8217;s theory is that globalization of trade can bring about a kinder and gentler world, a world of inter-ethnic tolerance consistent with the idealistic notions found in some of Paul&#8217;s epistles.  Wright postulates that such notions were driven by Paul&#8217;s involvement with long-distance trade in the Roman Empire, where ethnic and national differences were put aside in the name of doing business.   Wright points out, more as a side-point to his theory, that Paul still considered himself a Jew and a Jewish reformer.  Paul&#8217;s reforms (i.e., extending the franchise to gentiles in the name of Christ, the slain but risen messiah, without imposing Levitical laws upon them) were ultimately unrecognizable to the mainstream of Judaism. When reading St. Paul, it is hard to imagine that he presumed to speak to Judaism, although he repeatedly implied that he was (e.g., he often preached in temples during his three missionary journeys).  However, Paul was successful in establishing a new world movement, even if that wasn&#8217;t what he had in mind.  <\/p>\n<p>So, will we see a GOP version of a St. Paul?  And will something new evolve from it, as did Christianity from Judaism?  If the Dems veer too far to the left, perhaps we will.  Sarah Palin will not be embraced by the public as the alternative (thank goodness).  Some of the younger Republicans like <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Michael_S._Steele\" target=\"_blank\">Michael Steele<\/a> and John McCain&#8217;s daughter <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Meghan_McCain\" target=\"_blank\">Meghan<\/a> are discussing their openness toward more centrist ideas regarding government (e.g., support for universal health care) and the &#8220;values&#8221; questions (e.g., stem cell research, gay marriage).  John McCain himself was almost a Saint Paul; had he stuck with his earlier, more centrist positions, the GOP might have started the great debate, an internal debate that will be necessary for it to stay relevant in a changing America.  But unfortunately, McCain  cravenly veered back to the neo-conservative platform; and as such, the Republicans went down to defeat in unity.  <\/p>\n<p>But perhaps within five or ten years an attractive, viable candidate will emerge who will challenge the now-stale Reagan \/ Bush doctrines that the GOP clings to, in favor of balancing government involvement and personal \/ economic freedom.  And it&#8217;s not impossible that the core of the Grand Old party will ultimately reject and disown this movement, much as Judaism in the first and second centuries eventually chose to deny the growing Christian movement.  We might then see a viable but forever-minority Republican Party (led by Sarah Palin), and the growth of a popular centrist party in America, as has been anticipated by some writers for years.  <\/p>\n<p>Actually, that&#8217;s still a long-shot scenario; the Democrats would have to really push their &#8220;power to the people&#8221; (THEIR people, anyway) big-government initiatives before the public would take a new centrist movement seriously.  But there are certain money interests, such as quasi-Republican Michael Bloomberg, who might be attracted by such a scenario.  You never know when the next <a href=\"http:\/\/www.associatedcontent.com\/article\/1035844\/the_black_swan_theory_of_being_unable.html\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;black swan&#8221;<\/a> will come home from ancient times to roost again.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>THE REPUBLICANS AND SAINT PAUL (no, not their convention site last year): The biggest question for the pundits and political analysts right now is whether the Obama Revolution is for real. Is the USA swinging away from laissez-faire capitalism, international unilateralism and government enforcement of &#8220;traditional values&#8221;, towards Euro-cosmopolitianism, higher taxes and socialism-lite? I am [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,23],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=205"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4565,"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205\/revisions\/4565"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=205"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=205"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=205"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}