{"id":336,"date":"2007-10-15T21:02:00","date_gmt":"2007-10-15T21:02:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/2007\/10\/15\/336\/"},"modified":"2015-07-30T19:45:40","modified_gmt":"2015-07-31T00:45:40","slug":"336","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/?p=336","title":{"rendered":"Civic Virtue"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Civility\">Civic virtue<\/a> is an interesting subject to think about.  Up to now, however, I haven\u2019t thought much about it.  It seemed to be discussed mostly by stuffy professors of ancient philosophy.  I\u2019ve also hear cranky conservatives complain about the lack of personal virtue today.   So it seemed out-of-touch with my own concerns.  But come to think about it, maybe the \u201cvirtue-ists\u201d have a point or two after all.<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps their most important point is that economic and governing systems can only cause \u201cprogressive outcomes\u201d (i.e., \u201cvirtuous\u201d outcomes like the most good for the most number) if the people involved act according to a higher, unwritten law, i.e. the law of virtue.   A state can have plenty of laws and the power to carry out those laws. That will definitely keep most people in check. So perhaps some forms of virtue \u2013 the negative forms, i.e. thou shall not kill, thou shall not steal, thou shall not play your music loud late at night \u2013 can be imposed by force.  <\/p>\n<p>But the more positive forms of virtue \u2013 taking responsibility, being careful and considerate of others (Golden Rule style), helping the young and the old and the unfortunate, thinking about the greater good as well as your own good, developing and using your talents to the fullest, having courage &#8212; that sort of thing can\u2019t be forced.   But civilization needs tons and tons of it just to survive, and needs even more of it to improve over time.  We can all see that we\u2019re better off when plenty of virtuous people surround us.  So how can we promote the more positive forms of civic virtue?  And how can we maintain the \u201cnegative forms\u201d (i.e., maintaining law and order) of virtue without having non-virtuous side effects (dictatorship, tyranny, police states, etc.).<\/p>\n<p>When you start thinking about virtue, as I did over the past few days, you come up with a lot more questions than answers.  In addition to the questions I\u2019ve already asked, one can ask \u2013 does free-market capitalism ultimately promote or hinder virtue?  Is education the \u201cgarden of virtue\u201d \u2013  can it be?  Does political freedom promote virtue?  Does the mass media help people become virtuous, or just the opposite?  Can virtue thrive in a highly mixed and individualist society like America today, or is a \u201ccommon thread\u201d necessary to promote virtue (e.g., Hispanics, NASCAR fans, unionized workers, Methodists, liberals, Odd Fellows, etc.)?  Does poverty discourage virtue (increased crime, unstable families, more drug abuse and other irresponsible \/ short-term behavior) \u2013 or is poverty driven by loss of virtue within a group?  And what about riches \u2013 what virtues do they erode (e.g., friendliness and sharing attitudes)?  And what about big organizations \u2013 individuals arguably have some biological tendency towards virtue, but what about big government, big political parties, big corporations, big religions, big terrorism networks?  Is the world more or less virtuous on average because of the tendency towards big organization in our world today? <\/p>\n<p>I don\u2019t know the answers to these questions.  I do have one comment, however.  When people gain a lot of power, virtue is harder to come by.  History has examples of kings and barons and popes and dictators who were in fact highly concerned with making things better for their subjects.  But they seem mostly to be the exceptions that prove the rule.  And the rule seems to be that power corrupts.  Ego becomes cancerous when bathed in the klieg lights of fame.  Our modern world has created a lot of power, and that power has created a lot of powerful people \u2013 presidents, CEO\u2019s, billionaires, governors, celebrities, religious fundamentalists, world-class athletes, etc.  What\u2019s even worse is that we now have effective techniques for the non-virtuous to appear virtuous before their vassals.  Will this world retain all the power and might that it has accumulated in modern times (scientific knowledge, technology, international commerce, nuclear armies and navies, instant communications, etc.) if its leaders can\u2019t retain the virtues that made them leaders in the first place?  <\/p>\n<p>Some thinkers say that the Roman Empire fell because civic virtue had eroded amidst the population.  But my (admittedly rough) read of Roman history is that the Empire created a lot of economic, social and military power, creating a lot more powerful people than history had ever known.  And when those people started fighting amidst themselves (due no doubt to their own virtue lapses), civilization was destined to crash.  The world reset itself back to the Dark Ages, where only a few people (kings and popes) had real power.    Is America\u2019s \u201ccredit card against the future\u201d policies, together with the threat of global warming, pushing us towards another such \u201ccivilization reset\u201d?  I do think that the western world is wiser today than it was in 500 AD.  But is it wise enough to maintain virtue in the face of all the powerful forces that it has unleashed?  Next time you see a child being wheeled by you in a stroller, you can think: his or her generation may well be the one that finds out.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Civic virtue is an interesting subject to think about. Up to now, however, I haven\u2019t thought much about it. It seemed to be discussed mostly by stuffy professors of ancient philosophy. I\u2019ve also hear cranky conservatives complain about the lack of personal virtue today. So it seemed out-of-touch with my own concerns. But come to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/336"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=336"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/336\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5595,"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/336\/revisions\/5595"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=336"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=336"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=336"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}