{"id":3480,"date":"2013-06-09T14:07:07","date_gmt":"2013-06-09T19:07:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/?p=3480"},"modified":"2013-06-09T14:07:07","modified_gmt":"2013-06-09T19:07:07","slug":"god-the-higgs-particle-and-oops-leon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/?p=3480","title":{"rendered":"God, the Higgs Particle, and &#8216;Oops-Leon&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday I talked about the axion, a prime candidate for the particle that finally explains and solves the &#8220;dark matter problem&#8221; in modern cosmology. I&#8217;d like to add one more good thing about axions: no one would dare call them a &#8220;God particle&#8221;, as with the Higgs. Nonetheless, they will explain a bigger component of God&#8217;s creation than the Higgs does (i.e., all of dark matter, versus mass in a small portion of both regular and dark matter).<\/p>\n<p>The whole &#8220;God particle&#8221; debacle goes back to a book published in 1993 by two atheists, physicist Leon Lederman and his ghost-writer Dick Teresi (The <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_God_Particle:_If_the_Universe_Is_the_Answer,_What_Is_the_Question%3F\">God Particle: If the Universe is the Answer, What is the Question<\/a>).  In this book, Lederman says that he called the yet-undiscovered Higgs the &#8220;God Particle&#8221; because it would be crucial to understanding the structure of matter, and because it somehow reminded him of the Book of Genesis.  The latter reasoning sounds very poetic, but <a href=\"http:\/\/m.npr.org\/news\/front\/174440162?start=40\">a recent discussion<\/a> between NPR reporters and Mr. Teresi seems to indicate that the motivation was more a matter of capturing the imagination of a publisher regarding all the money they could make on this book, given the snappy, attention-getting title.<\/p>\n<p>So, the &#8220;God&#8221; that these intellectual atheists appeared to have had in mind was the God of Money.  Why am I not surprised?<\/p>\n<p>Another reason not to take the &#8220;God Particle&#8221; moniker for the Higgs very seriously <!--more-->regards Dr. Lederman&#8217;s previous experience with naming new elementary particles.  In 1977, Lederman and his team at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory believed they were on the verge of discovering an unknown particle based on the data streaming out from their atom-smasher experiments.  The data was still a bit tricky (it wouldn&#8217;t have passed the standards used for the Higgs particle), but Lederman immodestly decided to jump the gun and name it the Upsilon Particle, after the Greek Letter Upsilon (\u03a5).   Not long thereafter, further data showed Lederman to be wrong.  So, the non-existent particle is still remembered today as the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Oops-Leon\">&#8220;Oops-Leon&#8221;<\/a>.  <\/p>\n<p>You&#8217;d have thought that the guy would have learned a lesson in humility, but in the years between the &#8220;Oops-Leon&#8221; and the God Particle book, Lederman received a Nobel Prize.  I&#8217;m sure that Dr. Lederman deserved the Nobel for his work on understanding neutrinos and his discovery of the bottom quark; but he likewise deserves another &#8220;Oops-Leon&#8221; for the whole &#8220;Higgs as God Particle&#8221; fiasco!  It reflects modern scientistic hubris at its best (or worst, actually). Beware of atheists claiming to know the power of God.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday I talked about the axion, a prime candidate for the particle that finally explains and solves the &#8220;dark matter problem&#8221; in modern cosmology. I&#8217;d like to add one more good thing about axions: no one would dare call them a &#8220;God particle&#8221;, as with the Higgs. Nonetheless, they will explain a bigger component of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12,9,23],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3480"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3480"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3480\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3484,"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3480\/revisions\/3484"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3480"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3480"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3480"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}