{"id":7688,"date":"2020-11-18T04:52:59","date_gmt":"2020-11-18T09:52:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/?p=7688"},"modified":"2020-11-30T15:41:41","modified_gmt":"2020-11-30T20:41:41","slug":"not-really-such-a-good-election-for-the-dems","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/?p=7688","title":{"rendered":"Not Really Such a Good Election for the Dems"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;m glad to see that Joe Biden won the election and will be the next President, come late January. I&#8217;m not so sure that there weren&#8217;t any significant voter irregularities or fraud in this election, given all of the mail-in ballots and new rules and procedures that were quickly implemented in the wake of the COVID pandemic. But I <a href=\"https:\/\/www.marketwatch.com\/story\/trumps-legal-challenges-wont-change-elections-results-karl-rove-11605192821\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">doubt if they will make a difference<\/a>, despite all of Mr. Trump&#8217;s efforts in court (and I agree that Trump and the GOP should get its day in court). It&#8217;s a good sign so far that Trump doesn&#8217;t appear to be stirring up white nationalist groups in preparation for a violent putch. And it doesn&#8217;t look as if GOP state legislators have the appetite for violating long tradition and sending a pro-Trump delegation to the Electoral College in states where Biden won, however narrowly. The GOP may not yet be done with Donald Trump (unfortunately), but for now Trump is a sinking ship; even if most of the rats on board are sitting tight for now, none of the shore-side rats are jumping on. <\/p>\n<p>But still, the Democrats didn&#8217;t do very well overall on Election Day. There have been many articles about this over the past few weeks (here&#8217;s a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.realclearpolitics.com\/articles\/2020\/11\/13\/why_democrats_ought_not_celebrate_too_hard_144652.html\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">good one<\/a>), citing disappointing Senate race results, loss of seats in the House, GOP gains with minority voters, and unfavorable net results on the state legislature and state governor levels. <\/p>\n<p>My one contribution to this is a quick and dirty summary of how the Electoral College map changed for both parties as a result of the 2016 and 2020 elections.  Here is my summation:<!--more--><\/p>\n<p><strong>OHIO<\/strong> (18 votes):  Battleground to Solid GOP state<\/p>\n<p><strong>FLORIDA<\/strong>(29 votes): Battleground to Solid GOP state<\/p>\n<p><strong>GEORGIA<\/strong>(16): Solid GOP to Battleground state<\/p>\n<p><strong>MICHIGAN<\/strong>(16): Will keep as Solid DEM, call 2016 a one-time fluke specific to Hillary Clinton.<\/p>\n<p><strong>PENNSYLVANIA<\/strong>(20): Solid DEM to Battleground (Biden has an 82.5K margin in PA, about 1.5% points; but he had a unique advantage being a favored son. Also, mid and western PA is subject to the trends in Ohio favoring the GOP. I believe that future GOP candidates will remain competitive in PA)<\/p>\n<p><strong>WISCONSIN<\/strong>(10): Solid DEM to Battleground<\/p>\n<p><strong>ARIZONA<\/strong>(11): Solid GOP to Battleground<\/p>\n<p><strong>NORTH CAROLINA<\/strong>(15): Remains Mostly GOP, despite Obama victory in 2008; remember that Obama also won Indiana in 08, but that state has since solidified its GOP status.<\/p>\n<p><strong>DEMS OVERALL:<\/strong>  Lose 2 battleground states (47 potential votes); Gain 2 battlegrounds (27 votes); Lose 2 SOLID states (30) \u2013 NET: Lose 2 SOLIDs (30 votes), lose 20 potential battleground votes<\/p>\n<p><strong>GOP OVERALL:<\/strong> Lose 2 SOLID states (27 votes); Gain 2 SOLIDs (47 votes); Gain 2 battleground states (30 potential votes) \u2013 NET: Gain 2 battlegrounds (30 votes), gain 20 SOLID votes.<\/p>\n<p>OK, my methodology here is pretty much gut-feel; admittedly this analysis isn&#8217;t up to Nate Silver or Nate Cohn standards. Yet it still appears to me that the GOP came away with a somewhat more favorable Electoral College map for 2024, despite Biden&#8217;s victory.<\/p>\n<p>As to President Biden &#8212; I am old enough to remember the election of Jimmy Carter in 1976.  Carter seemed very popular at the time; he represented a new day for the nation, a breath of fresh air after the murky Watergate intrigue of Richard Nixon.  And yet, 4 years later the public turned and lost its enthusiasm, handing Ronald Reagan a decisive victory.  Biden is in a somewhat similar position; Trump lost just enough favor amidst his slender majority because of his inept handling of the COVID pandemic, and Biden seemed like a reasonable alternative. I can&#8217;t help but wonder if Carter-itis will set in once again amidst a fickle centrist electorate. Biden got the nod, but CLEARLY did not get a mandate from the electorate (I doubt if the Democrats can go 2 for 2 in the upcoming special Senatorial election in Georgia).<\/p>\n<p>Finally, the expected <a href=\"https:\/\/www.brookings.edu\/research\/2020-exit-polls-show-a-scrambling-of-democrats-and-republicans-traditional-bases\/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">trends in voting<\/a> for 2020 were not as favorable to the Democrats as had been hoped. First off, Biden&#8217;s margins amidst non-white voters went down relative to Hillary Clinton in 2016; blacks went from 81% margin in 2016 to 75% margin (but their increased turnout in 2020 made up for this effect in Biden&#8217;s favor); the  Latinx\/Hispanic margin decreased from 38% to 35%; and interestingly, the Asian American margin decreased from 38% to 27%. Had Trump done as well with whites as he did in 2016, he would now be the President-elect. Luckily, he didn&#8217;t. However, as to whether a future, more progressively-oriented Democratic candidate can keep those white voters while reclaiming the expanding pro-Trump black, Latinx and Asian voter block is a very uncertain matter.<\/p>\n<p>Before the election, many pundits and political analysts predicted that white women would trend towards Biden, especially non-college women. No dice on that one! Trump&#8217;s margin for white non-college women remained at 27% in both 2016 and 2020. White college-grad women went up from 7% to 9% margin for Biden, but it was white men, both college and non-college, who moved significantly towards Biden. <\/p>\n<p>Trumps margin for college degree white men dropped from 14% in 2016 to 3% &#8212; a significant change! And for non-college white men, Trump&#8217;s margin with them was cut from 48% to 42%.  Hmmm, cue Hillary Clinton and her argument that male misogyny was responsible for her loss (of course, she <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bbc.com\/news\/world-us-canada-41244474\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">blamed a lot of other people and factors<\/a> in addition to sexist men!).<\/p>\n<p>Biden did quite well with younger voters, as expected. His 2020 margin for 18-29 voters went up from 19% in 2015 to 24%. However, his margin for the 30-44 group declined from 10% to 6%. Very old voters 65+ (which includes me!) still went for Trump, by 7% in 2016 and 5% in 2020; it was thought that these voters would have been more sensitive to Trump&#8217;s mishandling of the COVID pandemic. However, Biden did make inroads with the 45-64 group, lowering Trump&#8217;s margin from 8% in 2016 to 1%. <\/p>\n<p>In sum, all of this says to me that Biden got in because of a relatively special set of circumstances.  Overall, the country still seems like fertile ground for future GOP candidates (hopefully not a 78 year old Trump!).  The litany of &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/magazine\/2020\/11\/12\/2020-election-analysis-democrats-future-david-shor-interview-436334\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">demographic destiny<\/a>&#8221; for national Democrats is clearly not playing out, and the Biden Administration will need a lot of skill and luck in order to keep the Democrats in the game for 2024 and beyond.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;m glad to see that Joe Biden won the election and will be the next President, come late January. I&#8217;m not so sure that there weren&#8217;t any significant voter irregularities or fraud in this election, given all of the mail-in ballots and new rules and procedures that were quickly implemented in the wake of the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,7],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7688"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7688"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7688\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7705,"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7688\/revisions\/7705"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7688"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7688"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jimgworld.com\/blog1\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7688"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}