The ramblings of an Eternal Student of Life     
. . . still studying and learning how to be grateful and make the best of it
 
 
Thursday, November 27, 2003
◊ 
Uncategorized ...

So, I’ve lived to see my fiftieth Thanksgiving. And I suppose that I should be thankful for that. Thanksgiving is obviously meant to be a day for giving thanks. Ironically, it comes during the later part of the autumn season here in North America, a melancholy time when another cold, dark winter is setting in. If you really wanted to feel thankful on Thanksgiving, late April or early May would probably have been a better time for it.

I agree that there is need for thankfulness, given that people don’t fully appreciate the gifts and possibilities of human life, i.e. of love, beauty, art, accomplishment, intelligence, collaboration, understanding and wisdom. On the other side of the coin, being human is not an unmixed blessing. There’s still a lot of pain attached to each and every life, lots of disappointment, lots of sickness, lots of stupidity, lots of misunderstanding, lots of fear, lots of weakness, lots of loneliness, lots of anger and lots of hate. We have the brains to define an ideal of human civilization, but we aren’t able to live up to it. So, there are a lot of things about living that are NOT to be thankful for.

In sum, being a human in the year 2003 is a mixed bag. Maybe it’s getting better over the years, and maybe it’s not. There were two articles in the NY Times that recently explored both sides of the issue. On the pessimistic side, there was an article on Nov. 25th in the Science section about our genetic similarities with chimpanzees, who have made warfare a natural part of life. Male chimps have the inbred urge to band together, mark off territory, defend it, and try to expand it by raiding other male gangs who have similarly marked off their own boundaries. Scientific observations have proven that these chimps are not playing; if one chimp “army” is stronger than the other, it will kill as many enemy chimps as possible, and even wipe out a neighboring colony if possible. It seems to be a genetic thing.

The big question is, do humans have a similar genetic set-up? As the Rolling Stones song goes, are we all “Monkey Men”? Another Times article, on Nov. 11, seemed to argue that we aren’t. Sure, there are a lot of similarities between our propensity to war and that of the chimp, and we do share 98% of a chimp’s genetics. But there is a chance that we are just victims of misunderstandings and circumstances, and that we can yet learn not to be such animals when faced with frustrating circumstances.

I’m on the fence about this. I’d like to think that aggression and war is just a big mistake and that people can be taught the value of tolerance, cooperation and peace. On the other side of the coin, just when are we going to start seeing some evidence of such a learning process? There seems to have been war ever since humans gained the language tools and other means to organize on a large scale. Everyone seems to know that war ultimately makes things worse for the overall lot of humankind; even if it benefits a group in the immediate future, it obviously sets a precedent that will eventually harm that group’s children and grandchildren. And yet, the urge to war is very strong, almost as mysterious and intractable as the urge to sex. People just naturally agree to war as the preferred option to resolve their unhappiness, even when they know there will be hell to pay for using it (recall the high approval ratings for the war in Iraq back in March; interestingly, they are down quite a bit since then, from around 80% to around 55%). War really does seem as strongly grounded in our genes as the sexual drive is. That’s just my two cents, you can find people who know a whole lot more about genetics and anthropology than me who argue that this is not true.

But then again, I don’t think that the urge to aggression and war, even if genetically based, is unstoppable. We also have a genetic ability and propensity to think. Flexibility is the calling card of the human species. Chimpanzees can live in warm climates with lots of fruit trees, but not in deserts or mountains or arctic regions. Humans can live in such areas, because they can think out new responses to environmental challenges. So I haven’t given up hope that someday, our species will think up ways to avoid the stupidity and destruction of warfare. For that I’m thankful. Unfortunately, I don’t think I’m going to live to see that day. For that, I’m quite sad. An appropriate paradox for a holiday of thankfulness set in the melancholy month of November.

◊   posted by Jim G @ 5:43 pm       No Comments Yet / Leave a Comment
 
 
Thursday, November 20, 2003
◊ 
Uncategorized ...

The Eternal Student “Civilization Ain’t Dead Yet” Award: This one goes out to Nickleback for the cover of their latest CD “The Long Road”. I saw it in Best Buys the other day and said to myself “My God, Impressionism!” Let’s hope that other bands get the idea of incorporating classic art within their marketing plans.

Note of Caution to Not-Quite-Geeks: Be careful in disposing of a broken computer or any storage media, including CDs, floppys, hard drives, whatever. Someone recently told me that there’s a little industry forming, made up of people who roam around landfills or cruise through suburban neighborhoods on junk collection day, looking for thrown-out computers. They take ’em home and hook the storage media up to a diagnostic machine, searching it for files or memories containing Social Security numbers, credit card numbers, passwords, registration numbers, etc. Obviously they sometimes find things of value, or else they wouldn’t be doing this. Good old identity theft. I’m not an expert at how to permanently destroy memory – there are probably web sites that deal with this. But do keep the overall problem in mind when you throw computer-related stuff out.

Not-So-Famous-Last-Words: Back in 2000 we got some new computer equipment at work and they gave me a PC with an external USB drive meant for Imation “Super Disks”. Super Disks were a nice idea, a three and one-half inch “floppy” that had enhanced media inside holding 120 megs of data, not the usual 1.44 megs of regular floppys. Sure, CDRW was prevalent by then, but CD drives seemed clunky and slow compared to a floppy drive (and still do). The Super Disk seemed like a happy compromise, easy to use and carry but still holding a lot of stuff.

So, when I ordered a Dell for home, I shelled out an extra $50 for a floppy drive that reads LS-120 Super Disks. I figured that they couldn’t miss. Imation was quite optimistic too. On the back of each Super Disk case it said “Here to Stay. Super Disk will become the new standard disk drive … soon you’ll see Super Disk Drives built into desktop PC,s notebooks, external drives … It’s the technology with staying power”.

The prophecy was not to be fulfilled. Imation never let the price go below $10 a disk (which was reasonable compared to a regular floppy, given that it held 80 times as much data, but no contest against a 50 cent CD that held 5 times more than the Super Disk).

So, Super Disks have gone the way of the eight-track tape. I’ve got seven disks at home and I still like to use them. But obviously I don’t put anything on them that isn’t backed up somewhere else. Sic transit gloria …

◊   posted by Jim G @ 7:55 pm       No Comments Yet / Leave a Comment
 
 
Sunday, November 16, 2003
◊ 
Uncategorized ...

For me, one of the scariest things about the Muslim world and culture is its general lack of humor … at least any sort of humor that we westerners would recognize. That’s a major barrier, something that blocks the finding of common ground and cultural understanding. However, I just read about Shabana Rehman, the 26 year old Muslim “standupkomiker” from Norway (as she is described on her web site). She hails from Karachi, Pakistan, but migrated with family to northern Europe at a young age.

Ms. Rehman gives it to the fundamentalists right in the eye, coming on stage wrapped in a traditionalist burka and then throwing it off to do the rest of her routine in a cocktail dress. She also has choice comments about western-liberal political correctness (which still has some fans up in the Scandinavian countries). The Norwegian liberals aren’t exactly complaining, but the radical Muslims often harass her or cause a scene at her shows. (She probably works it into the act, and the liberals just figure it was all staged).

Ms. Rehman is showing the power of comedy to make people think. She’s taking some heavy risks to build bridges where the bullets and mortars are still flying. I definitely take my hat off to her. Some of her stuff is a bit over the top, e.g. the photo of her in the nude with the flag of Norway painted on her skin that appeared recently in some European political magazine. But hey, artists sometimes get brash to make a point. Ms. Rehman is making a lot of points, but the one I like the most is that we should all ultimately define ourselves according to our own internal standards; we should not have it dictated to us by our family, our home country, our adopted culture, our religious traditions, our fashion setters, our TV advertisements, etc.

I think that Ms. Rehman is saying that we need to lessen our desire to be just another sheep in the flock, another bee in the hive. We’re humans, not insects. We can create and recreate ourselves into something totally unique, just as each snowflake is like no other. We can pick and choose our own interests, our own fashions, our own traditions, and our own beliefs, regardless of how popular they are. If Indian head pennies or Amish quilts or Easter Island idols or 70’s pop music or school board politics (or even blogging) appeal to your soul – well, go for it. But just remember, other people’s souls are drawn to totally different things, and you’ve gotta respect and tolerate their preferences if you’re gonna expect any respect for your own.

If you check out Ms. Rehman’s web site, you won’t get too much from it unless you can read Norwegian. But there’s one picture there that sez it all, no translation needed. Ms. Rehman is dressed in traditional Middle Eastern female attire, with some kind of jewel over her forehead. And yet, she’s holding a pair of skis. Most excellent! That’s the ultimate weapon against the people who train suicide bombers and terrorists. And as Ms. Rehman points out, we westerners also need to break out of our molds, the ones that affluence and economic freedom paradoxically create. We need to do some independent thinking ourselves in the face of consumerism and crafty marketing strategies (I mean, if political operatives really think that the typical ads you see around election time can convince people to vote for their candidate, then Americans ain’t got their thinking caps on right).

P.S. one element of my own individuality is my taste for craft-brewed dark beers (OK, not exactly cutting edge anymore, but still pretty good for a guy who grew up drinking Coke and Pepsi all day – can’t even touch that stuff anymore, surprised that anyone over the age of 18 still drinks that glop). I haven’t offered too many reviews here, but I just tried a new one that raised my eyebrows. It’s called Old Heathen Imperial Stout by Weyerbacher, brewed near the Delaware River in Easton, PA. Weyerbacher is not as fashionable as the various craft brewers from Colorado, Oregon or Vermont, and it’s had its problems with light beers (some of which are downright skunky). But Weyerbacher seems to know dark beers rather well (they’ve had a nice raspberry stout for some time), and this one hits the nail right on the head. It’s full-bodied but not syrupy, smooth and maybe even silky, with plenty of dark chocolate and coffee tones. It has a nice lacy head to it, neither foamy nor flat.

This is alcohol as it was meant to be – expensive, well done, to be sipped and savored in moderation, and not gulped down in a drunken stupor. Moslem fundamentalists seem to fear alcohol (although the 9-11 terrorists had no problem belting it down), while typical Americans and western Europeans are too prone to get drunk. It’s up to the radical individualists like Shabana Rehman to find the middle ground. Perhaps Weyerbacher should send her a complementary six of Old Heathen. It’s probably a great beer for the long, cold winters up in Norway.

◊   posted by Jim G @ 5:06 pm       No Comments Yet / Leave a Comment
 
 
Tuesday, November 11, 2003
Spirituality ...

The Buddhists supposedly have a credo that goes as follows:

Let me respectfully remind you, life and death are of supreme importance. Time swiftly passes by and opportunity is lost. Each of us should strive to awaken. Awaken! Take heed. Do not squander your life.

Gee, I didn’t think that the Buddhists were in such a sweat about death. One of the things I always admired about disciples of the Buddha was their belief in reincarnation. I grew up in the Catholic faith, which like most Christian religions taught that we get only one chance at heaven. If we don’t cut the mustard in this life, there are no second chances. If the clock runs out on you with one unforgiven mortal sin on your slate, it’s off to hell with you. (As though life on earth isn’t hell enough).

For those of you who have experienced the more fundamentalist Protestant sects, it may come as a surprise to learn that the Roman Catholics are just as paranoid about the final judgment as any Calvinist. But they are. My guess is that they wish to discourage moral sloth. Rome knows from millenniums of experience that many if not most people are on the lookout for an angle. If the Church were to ease up on the moral rules a bit, someone with a sharp legal mind (or a good attorney) is surely going to misuse the system. So the Catholics keep the standards strict, so as to make sure that souls are not cast into hell because they didn’t understand the rules properly. In other words, the Pope doesn’t want to die and have St. Peter inform him that he has a class-action lawsuit pending against him on the part of the souls in hell who claim they were not properly informed.

The Buddhist doctrine in reincarnation would obviously be greatly abused by such shrewd counselors of moral law. The soul looking to justify live a life full of sinful power and pleasure without worry of eternal consequences would obviously say, what the heck, I’ll have my greedy pleasures in this life and get around to making up for it in some future go-round. Eventually I’ll get to heaven. No eternal flames to worry about, I’ll get as many chances as I want.

(Sidenote: George Bernard Shaw had an interesting take on the afterlife in Man and Superman / Don Juan In Hell. According to Shaw, Hell is a place where you can do whatever you like and have all the powers and sensual pleasures that you please, non-stop. There are no flames, no suffering, no rules, no curfews, and no one stopping you from leaving. Don Juan obviously winds up there, but after a while starts to get sick of it. In the end he walks away, looking for the real heaven. In other words, even a rogue like Don Juan can eventually find spiritual maturity and moral integrity.)

Personally, I like the reincarnation view. Most peoples’ lives just don’t seem long enough and rich enough to set them on the path to eternal wisdom. This world just doesn’t seem like a good place to realize a sense of true fulfillment. After a frustrating day at work, I often console myself by thinking, “maybe in another life …”

But once in a blue moon you do meet someone who seems close to the ultimate truth and who seems endowed with the power to achieve things that are humane, intelligent and truly worthwhile. (And of course you often run across those who are far from it; anyone who drives regularly in northern New Jersey will experience several of those souls on any given day). So it does seem as though people come into the world with varying amounts of pre-fixed spiritual wisdom, unspoken wisdom that guides the course and conduct of their life. That idea obviously is a totally subjective notion on my part; I couldn’t imagine any way to scientifically test it.

So it surprises me to find that Buddhists chant a prayer at their services that encourages them to worry about time running out. You’d think that they would instead cite the phrase that confirmed Arnold’s pop idol status: “I’ll Be Back”. Just imagine someone on his or her death bed after a life that went to waste, a total loser, didn’t accomplish anything significant, all their dreams and visions went up in smoke, everything was a crash and burn … and with their last breath and a defiant look in their eye … you get the picture. Didn’t Jesus of Nazareth say something like this? And in a way, wasn’t he right? (I don’t believe in the physical resurrection, of course, but through the history and spiritual longings of his successors, the life of Jesus of Nazareth continued and is still going strong).

Of course, many Buddhists would add another word to this line: “Unfortunately”. The Tibetian Book of the Dead is a set of prayers to be said on the death of someone, begging that the departed soul not come back but instead find its way to Nirvana. If it does come back, the Book prays in the alternative that the soul’s next earthly incarnation be the final run. The Buddhists supposedly don’t believe in God, but then again why would they sing out prayerful petitions upon the death of a loved one if they didn’t think that some transcendent entity was listening?

I guess I still don’t understand the Buddhists. Perhaps that’s as it should be. The Buddhists, for all their human faults, are a people close to mystery. And mystery obviously wouldn’t be mystery if it were understood.

◊   posted by Jim G @ 8:00 pm       No Comments Yet / Leave a Comment
 
 
Friday, November 7, 2003
◊ 
Uncategorized ...

A THOUSAND WORDS ARE WORTH A PICTURE: For all you booklovers out there, here’s the motif above the door at the local library.

 

 

To be honest, I don’t use the public library much any more. If I want to read a book I schlep over to Borders or log on to Amazon and buy it. If I want to look something up, I check out Google. But hey, I’m glad to pay tax dollars to keep the libraries open. They’re outposts of civility and reason in an increasingly uncivilized world. Well, at least they are when kids aren’t jammed into them, fooling around while pretending to be doing homework.

The mini-computer is doing the public library harm in more ways than one. There are all sorts of computers available in the libraries these days with all sorts of referencing tools. I myself have no idea how to use them. Because of short staffing due to budget cutbacks, it’s hard to find anyone to explain how they work. I was taught the old ways of finding things in libraries (card files, periodical indexes), and those old ways are all gone. The local library may still be a gold mine of information, but I have almost no way of getting at it.

Nevertheless, I still like to stop in and wander around a library every now and then, amidst the other lonely old psychos and losers you usually find in them. The ideas and ideals behind and within the libraries are still an inspiration and are still worth preserving.

◊   posted by Jim G @ 10:55 pm       No Comments Yet / Leave a Comment
 
 
Tuesday, November 4, 2003
◊ 
Uncategorized ...

MISTAKEN IDENTITY: I used to watch the X-Files on occasion, although I never became a true X-cult member (I suppose that I don’t really want to believe). That show was a bit too graphic and violent for me. Nonetheless, the underlying theme of an alien invasion conspiracy was rather intriguing. Not that I believe that there really is something like that, but it made for a good story (when they used it; I never liked the “rogue monster” episodes).

The scene from the X-Files that I remember most was the time that Mulder’s public identity had somehow been shifted through alien magic to some other guy, and the real Mulder was being hunted down as a dangerous renegade. If memory serves me (which these days is not guaranteed), everyone thought that Fletcher was Mulder, Fletcher being some bit part guy who showed up every now and then for reasons never fully explained (just like everything else in the X Files). Towards the end of that episode, Agent Mulder stopped at a gas-and-go convenience store late at night and went inside, pricing a gallon of milk or something under the harsh fluorescent lights. Then the ominous music started playing and the dude behind the counter decided to abandon ship. (Good move — when that ominous music starts playing you know some major plop is gonna happen). Then the stormtroopers burst in with military gear and nabbed the real but thought to be unreal Agent Mulder.

As they led him away at the point of an automatic weapon, you saw Agent Dana Scully, Mulder’s work partner and soulmate, together with Fletcher out by the gas pumps. Scully was obviously under the alien spell that made everyone think Fletcher is Mulder, and she was obviously pleased that the impostor has been caught. Perhaps more than pleased; you could see the look of love in her eyes for Fletcher-as-Mulder. Seeing all this in passing, the real Mulder starts screaming at the top of his lungs, “SCULLY, HE’S NOT ME, HE’S NOT ME….” As the nasty federal agents jam him into the armored paddy wagon off in a dark corner of the gas station, you hear one last desperate “SCULLY, HE’S…” on the fade-out.

Want to know why this scene got stuck in my memory circuits? Because it touches a nerve with me and most every aging person who once had a dream of a better world. Maybe one in ten people who dream such dreams in their youth get to do something with them; the rest of us are forced by fear, circumstances and lack of will into one compromise after the other. We take on a hard shell in order to survive and fulfill some of the more immediate commitments that we’ve been assigned by fate (children, aging parents, attractive spouses that didn’t quite share our dreams but seemed right at the time, the temptations of a comfortable suburban life with all its techno-toys). We do what we must for the bucks. After a while we may even start believing in our new image, in ourselves as successful people. But somewhere deep inside the prison of our subconscious, there’s still that sensitive young soul looking out at who we’ve become, with our spiffy suits and fashionable haircuts, screaming “HE’S NOT ME! HE’S NOT ME!”

You might be able to think of other stories or plot lines that go something like this. The writers for the X Files weren’t the first to have thought it up. It’s a rather archetypal theme – the fear of inauthenticity. Of course, in the X Files, the aliens eventually slipped (or maybe it was all a part of their game — you never really knew with the X Files) and the real Mulder made a comeback. As for me, though — I’m quite not as optimistic.

◊   posted by Jim G @ 7:16 pm       No Comments Yet / Leave a Comment
 
 
Saturday, November 1, 2003
◊ 
Uncategorized ...

Autumn isn’t my favorite season. It’s nice, but it’s over too quickly. Before you know it you’re stuck with another long, cold, dark winter. Nonetheless, I’m still trying to make the best of it.

The other morning I got in my car and noticed that some of the falling leaves got stuck on the moist windshield during the night. Now, there was a picture of autumn. So I went back inside and got out the cheap-o digital. Didn’t come out too bad.
 

◊   posted by Jim G @ 11:12 am       No Comments Yet / Leave a Comment
 
 
Friday, October 31, 2003
◊ 
Uncategorized ...

A new female gang was discovered recently on the streets of East Orange. They call themselves the “FBI”. Catchy little acronym, eh? You might wonder just how these young women justify those initials. OK, here goes: Female Bitches In Charge.

That’s street language, all right. Light years away from the world of the grammatician, who would point out that “female bitches” is redundant, and “in charge” is a phrase consisting of two very independent words. A hyphen just wouldn’t work here. Thus, the acronym would more properly be BIC.

Of course, people who join street gangs do not earn their meals by making precise use of written and spoken language. They live in a world where brute force and sexual exchange are the language of government and commerce.

Does that mean that a gang member is necessarily less moral than a lawyer, businessman or senator, i.e. the people who command our world through the spoken and written word? I’ve seen a lot of deception and raw aggression asserted through the precise application of the mother tongue by highly educated and civilized people. Perhaps their means aren’t considered criminal, but their ends are hurtful none the less. Does that mean that I’d rather live in the world of Bloods, Crips and now the FBI? No, but mainly because I don’t play their game very well, whereby I can more or less survive against the word gangsters.

So long as we have Enrons and security firms giving bogus advice and sales strategies built around alluring advertisements aimed at getting the fast buck and politicians willing to say anything for the vote and businesses that poison our land and sea and skies, I would not tell a gang member in jail that my world is humanly superior to his (or hers, in the case of the FBI). Until my comfortable techno-suburban world becomes more honestly concerned about the streets where the gang bangers hail from, more willing to make some honest sacrifices to help people like them, and less tied to the unspoken official motto of the 21st Century (Screw You, I’ve Got Mine – and don’t think that charities aren’t some of the most enthusiastic practitioners of that), I’d say that we “mainstream” law-abiding Americans have nothing to be smug about.

You say that perhaps I should form a gang called the Bleeding Heart Liberals? The BHL, that is? Not bad, but not quite as catchy as “FBI” (although in a presumptuous mood, we could twist it around to “bleeding HEArt LibERalS”, i.e. HEALERS).

◊   posted by Jim G @ 10:47 pm       No Comments Yet / Leave a Comment
 
 
Monday, October 27, 2003
Current Affairs ... Society ...

SEX IS OVERRATED. You’ve heard that one before; it’s the “contrarian” mantra. Not that it’s altogether false. I’ve been through a marriage and a couple of other relationships in my life, and like everything else in life, there are many disappointments. For most young guys, though, that idea would come as a surprise, even a shock. I can’t speak for young women, having not been one, but I can say that a young fellow’s mind and body are full of hormones that convince him that sex is the biggest show on earth. To tell a young dude that some day he’s gonna look back on his sexual escapades and say, hmmmm, there were good days and bad, it just wouldn’t make any sense to him. At the age of 18 and maybe even 23, sex is like trumpets blowing in his ears and klieg lights flashing in his eyes.

I think that the following statement is closer to the truth: Sex is overly depended upon. Depended upon for what? For meaning in life. What is the meaning of life? Some say “chocolate”. But here in America, the most honest answer would seem to be sex (with chocolate perhaps a close second; both depend upon complex brain chemistry as part of their lure). I was in Target today buying some windshield wiper blades, and at the check out line I was looking at the magazine rack. The word “sex” appears quite frequently upon the magazine covers. And even when it doesn’t it still does, via all the flesh and muscles and T&A; displayed in rotogravure color.

Side point: I also noticed in Target that the women’s clothes section is much bigger than the men’s. Interesting commentary upon the mating habits of our species. With birds and certain animals, it’s the male that is bright and colorful, whereby the female is mostly brown and gray. With humans, it’s the female that takes on the plumage.

The Target check out line is not necessarily the bellwether of American cultural trends, but with regard to sex, you don’t need to look much farther for confirmation. Popular music is full of it, advertisements lure you with it, and television shows and movies can’t give you enough of it, at least on an innuendo basis. If you want the hard-core stuff, you used to have to venture into an underworld of dark little corner stores in the wrong part of town; but today all you need is an Internet connection and a credit card. I read somewhere that Google classifies and counts the search requests you sent it (maybe not all of them, but a representative sample anyway), and that sex is by far the leading category.

Cultural wisdom seems to say that sex is our primary reason for living. Mother Nature appears to say the same thing. Just as with rats and mice and roaches and pigeons and other successful species, the critters that have a lot of sex have a lot of progeny. But wait, we’re humans, not rats or mice or roaches or pigeons — that’s the knee-jerk response to such a comparison. So maybe that knee-jerk is saying that sex isn’t our primary reason for being after all?

The ancient Greek writers had some interesting views regarding sex. Yea, they get a bad rap these days for being misogynistic child molesters. For whatever reason, a lot of educated Greek men looked at 13 year old boys with lust back in 400 BCE. But most of them knew it was wrong. When they were good, those Greeks from the old days were very good, very wise. With regard to sex in general, they knew that sex was ultimately a mental quality and was not really tied to body features, shapes and textures. And they knew that if sex was about being human, and if being human was about being related, then sex was ultimately about human relations. They had the good sense to ponder the question of whether sex was the reason for the relationship, or was the relationship the reason for sex.

Again, when you’re guy in your teens or twenties, it seems obvious that maintaining a relationship with a woman — which, as you soon find out, isn’t so easy (and I’m sure this applies vice versa) — is mainly what you do as the price of sex. No young guy will say that out loud, for fear of getting cut off from the sweet pleasures; but put a bunch of guys together with some beer, and the topic inevitably turns to the struggle of keeping the woman in their lives satisfied.

The educated Greeks who wrote those wise and witty books and plays in ancient Athens were a little more idealistic about male-female relationships, however. They felt that it was possible for men and women to relate on the basis of character and values, to agree regarding their innermost values and visions. They believed that sex is more of a side-dish, and not the main course. I never read Homer’s Odyssey, but supposedly the story of Penelope and Odysseus exposes this viewpoint. The two of them are really made for one another. Fate separates them and they both have no idea where the other has gone; but since they are soul-mates, they never give up hope and thus never fool around on the side. They are re-united under dangerous and uncertain circumstances in a manner that exposes their one-mindedness. Only after that happens do they get to do the horizontal bop. The sex follows the romance and virtue. Modern American mythology (TV shows, movies, novels) is usually are set up the other way around.

From what I can tell, sex sometimes leads to a temporary state of mental transcendence (“when it’s good”, as they say). For a few seconds, the world seems to drop away, including all the interesting frills and flesh that seemed so exciting just a few minutes ago. You seem to be floating in a bodiless world where everything is all right. It’s something like music (again, good music, not the crummy stuff). Time doesn’t seem to matter; nothing is moving because everything is moving. Very nice. But then time comes back and the vision ends. You’re back where you started, back in the real world all sweaty and disheveled; it’s time to clean up and do whatever you’ve got to do to get along with whomever you might be with (you want to avoid that insect stuff where the female kills the male after mating).

I’m told that this transcendent sensation is basically what you’re shooting for when you shoot heroin. I can say from experience that in meditation you can also approach such a mental state (but it ain’t easy or reliable). And there are other non-sexual experiences, however rare, that bring people to the edge of transcendence, e.g. moments of great accomplishment and achievement, moments of fulfillment.

Back to sex …. when you’re young and full of hormones, it’s generally easy to achieve this level of transcendence. You might not even need someone else to participate, not at first anyway. Even after you get beyond that stage, however, you still don’t need to know all that much about whomever you convince to rub flesh with you. Love is nice, but lust is the main event. However, as you get into your 30s and 40s, the hormones start to recede. Mother Nature is leaving you on the side of the road; after the age of 30 or so, you’re not as good a prospect for getting a woman pregnant and then helping raise and protect the offspring as a 20 year old is. So, it just ain’t as much fun anymore, and you spend increasing amounts of time watching football versus chasing a member of the opposite sex around.

If you’re lucky, you eventually find out that love is important after all. For some odd reason, being in love is in an aphrodisiac. Even if the person you love isn’t quite as soft and curvy and attractive as it once took to turn you on, that person will still be sexy to you if you can somehow find reasons to love that person. (The biggest problem here in America is that most guys fall in love based on a woman’s initial sexiness; eventually that initial sexiness fades away with age, and then what have you got left?)

The human mind is a very flexible thing. It is programmed by nature to make you feel sexually attracted to members of the opposite sex whose bodies signal good reproductive qualities: i.e., youth, curvy hips for easy child delivery, and large breasts for good nutrition. (For now, let’s not consider the 4% or so who are programmed to be gay). Those are the mind’s default settings. But like a computer, the default settings can be changed. Even if a woman is no longer young and curvy and soft and thin and unwrinkled, she can still turn a guy on if she and that guy are soul-mates. After 20 years apart, Odysseus had the right to look at Penelope and say, hey babe, you’ve changed … you ain’t the fox that I once knew. But love and passion were still there after all, because the two of them saw the world in the same way.

Moral of the story: Sex may not be overrated, but it is over-depended upon. Here in the US, we depend upon sex as the reason for marriage and ultimately for life. Homer seemed to know that set-up wouldn’t work. There are other reasons for life, and they should be the ultimate reasons for marriage — and sex. Only if marriage is based on those reasons, and not on sex, will the sex remain good for the long haul. Yea, that’s one of those Zen-like paradoxes.

And just what are those “other reasons for life”? Well, they vary from person to person. For some people it’s science. You read about those wonderful lifelong marriages between scientists, where husband and wife were partners in their research (e.g., the Curies). For some, it’s art (yea, I know that artists are temperamental and marriages between writers or actors or painters or musicians often don’t do well; but you have some examples like Paul Newman). For many, it’s homemaking; the man likes to fix up the house and the woman likes to decorate; their lovely home is their mutual creation. And also childrearing; a tough project, but when it goes right, I suspect that it becomes the glue that keeps a lot of marriages together. And you do hear about those humanitarian-instinct couples, e.g. who go in the Peace Corps together.

Bottom line: Opposites may attract, but ultimately, birds of a feather stick together. If marriage is going to work over the long haul, then the couple has to believe in the same ultimate values and life goals. Looks are important, as is “liking the same things.” But both of these things are overwhelmed by the question of values and directions in life. Finding a soul-mate ain’t easy; believe me, I know. And it’s awfully hard sometimes to decide who is on the same wavelength with you on the “soulmate” level. If everyone waited until they were sure of that before getting married, there would be far fewer divorces, but there would also be far fewer marriages! Still, I think that people need to get away from the illusion that sex will make marriage and life alright (and that Viagra will keep things going once you hit 45), and put more focus on finding whatever it was that Homer envisioned between Penelope and Odysseus.

◊   posted by Jim G @ 8:40 pm       No Comments Yet / Leave a Comment
 
 
Saturday, October 25, 2003
Society ...

Back in the 1960s, domestic poverty was a hot political topic. In the 2000s, it’s not. Compassion fatigue at work, I guess. Nonetheless, urban poverty is still there, even if the politicians and the press are tired of it.

One thing from the inner cities that still gets some attention, other than rap music, is the street gang problem. Here in Essex County (Newark, NJ area), we recently had an interesting gang incident. A ghetto kid held up a local grocery and was unlucky enough to still be there when the police arrived. The kid got a little stupid and tried to rough up one of the cops. Had he stayed calm, he would have been out on bail. But, because of his disrespect, the charges got jacked up to second degree. So the kid was gonna be stuck in the county jail for a while.

Here in Essex, we have two county jails; basically one for the Bloods and one for the Crips. That’s not how it was planned, but that’s how it works out these days. Well, the kid in question was put in the Bloods jail, but after a week he told the corrections officers that he was uncomfortable because he was really a Crip. So, he got a bus ride out to the Crips jail. Within an hour of his arrival, a greeting committee rejected his credentials and told him that he’d have to be initiated into the Crips right then and there. I.e., three minutes of pure gang brutality. He agreed and the beating got under way. Unfortunately, after it was over, he was dead. Moral of the story: if you’re gonna pledge a street gang, don’t wait until you’re in prison. Get it done on the street where maybe some of your initiators haven’t been in jail yet and aren’t quite as tough and nasty.

Yes, sorry, that’s a bit cynical of me. The real point here is that the inner cities remain a fault line in the American Dream. Yea, people out there in their Hummers and McMansions don’t seem to be very worried, given that urban folk don’t appear to be doing any rioting these days. That tiff out in Los Angeles in ‘92 turned out to be an isolated incident after all. Ravaging hordes of urban poor aren’t looting and pillaging the suburbs, thank goodness. But the most desperate and dangerous faction, i.e. young men in the 15 to 25 age group, are increasingly turning to street gangs in order to give social and economic meaning to their lives.

Government reports estimate that the total gang population in the U.S. went from around 100,000 in 1980 to over 800,000 in the late 1990s. These studies say that gang membership and activity levels stabilized after 1995, but haven’t really gone down since then. A preliminary survey showed somewhat increased activity in 2002 (when the economy got worse). The number of gangs and gang members has gone down somewhat outside of the major cities, but appears to still be growing within them.

If we assume the number of gang members nationwide to be around 800,000, and about 66% of them are in cities of over 25,000 population (as per a recent government report), then about 530,000 urban males are presently gang members. The US Census indicates that there are about 6 million males between the ages of 15 and 24 in the central cities. So, it’s not far from the mark to say that an average of one in ten young men in the cities are gang members. In the poorest neighborhoods, that number is probably a lot higher. Maybe one in three, perhaps every other young guy in some places.

Scary stuff. There are various projects and programs to keep kids from joining street gangs, and our law enforcement agencies are working hard to bust them when they go over the line — and going over the line with drugs and violence is basically what the gangs are about. (Yes, I know that gang members talk about “love”, but I’ll pick money over love as the main incentive any day — for anything!). Unfortunately, all of the government and foundation-funded programs started thus far are just a spit in the wind. The gang problem hugely outweighs any effect that a nice group of social workers can have by giving presentations to eighth graders, or even what our police and prosecutors and prisons can do on the law enforcement end.

The gang phenomenon basically represents the outcasts of our American society and economy getting organized. So far, they’re not into any political or quasi-religious stuff; their efforts seem mostly aimed at making a living, not unlike the Cosa Nostra of old. Interestingly enough, they are getting more technologically sophisticated; in New Jersey, the Conrail Boyz were experts at using radios and night vision scopes to break into railroad train cars filled with high-value electronics, cigarettes, and other fence-able items. The State busted them a little while ago, but another generation of Boyz seem to have sprung up in place of the original crew. Once the idea is out there, it’s hard to stamp out.

So far, politics and perverted religion and terrorism is not a gang thing (although the Five Percenters are getting into a quasi-Islamic fundamentalist thing these days). But what if at some point they take a page from Hamas and Al Qaeda, after things continue to get worse in their neighborhoods and schools, after they become even more convinced that they have no role to play in our economic and social institutions … not a pretty thought.

◊   posted by Jim G @ 5:13 pm       No Comments Yet / Leave a Comment
 
 
TOP PAGE - LATEST BLOG POSTS
« PREVIOUS PAGE -- NEXT PAGE (OLDER POSTS) »
FOR MORE OF MY THOUGHTS, CHECK OUT THE SIDEBAR / ARCHIVES
To blog is human, to read someone's blog, divine
NEED TO WRITE ME? eternalstudent404 (thing above the 2) gmail (thing under the >) com

www.jimgworld.com - THE SIDEBAR - ABOUT ME - PHOTOS
 
OTHER THOUGHTFUL BLOGS:
 
Church of the Churchless
Clear Mountain Zendo, Montclair
Fr. James S. Behrens, Monastery Photoblog
Of Particular Significance, Dr. Strassler's Physics Blog
Weather Willy, NY Metro Area Weather Analysis
Spunkykitty's new Bunny Hopscotch; an indefatigable Aspie artist and now scholar!

Powered by WordPress