Last night I got up around 3:30 AM, and I knew that I wasn’t going to get back to sleep. I wasn’t upset about anything; every few weeks my sleep cycle just gets out of whack, and I have a few bad nights (and zombie days). I usually try to lay still and get as much rest as possible, but sometimes that really isn’t possible. So I got up last night and turned on the little plastic radio near my bedside. I tuned into the local station airing the national “Coast to Coast AM” talk show by George Noory, out of Los Angeles. I had recently read up on Noory in The Atlantic, and this was my chance to hear what he and his show were all about.
In a nutshell, Noory and “C2C” are about paranoia and the paranormal. His 4-hour overnight talk show has burgeoned in popularity over the past few years. Basically he’s the biggest thing on the conspiracy-theory market since the X-Files came to an end back in 2002. (Coincidence? I don’t think so. The X-Files gave the paranormal/paranoia crowd a rallying point, a cultural respectability; you would expect someone to eventually fill the vacuum left by it). I listened for about 30 minutes, and heard a handful of callers discussing President Obama’s recent cancellation of the Constellation space program, which was started under G.W. Bush so as to get the USA back on the moon and headed eventually for Mars. They were all defending the notion, against Noory’s very weak “devil’s advocate” posturing, that there are bigger reasons behind the cancellation than those given by the President.
According to these people, President Obama is not in charge; he’s mostly a puppet of some powerful shadow government, an unseen group that really runs the nation. This group has decided that it’s OK for humanity to send astronauts into low earth orbit (as the new Obama space plan includes $6 billion to help private space companies such as Elon Musk’s SpaceX group to develop rockets and capsules to take people into orbit, to get to the International Space Station and for other purposes). But it is NOT OK for people to go to the moon.
Why not? As when watching the X-Files, you never get a straight answer to any “why” question. But after a while, you get some hints. I didn’t really listen long enough last night to get all of the hints. But having had some X-Files viewing experience, I suspect that it means (or IS FELT to mean by sleepless paranoiacs) that something big is going on. Really big.
How big? We’re talking aliens having secret moon bases here, I think. We’re either talking about a conspiracy in cahoots with the aliens to prepare the way for their takeover of our fair planet, or at minimum, about a military group that knows what is going on and is valiantly (if hopelessly) working on a way to save our fair planet. One caller quoted recent statements by NASA’s current director, General Bolden, implying (if you twist them the right way) that NASA is now focusing on the “defense of the planet”. I.e., Bolden is letting the cat out of the bag . . . if you know what to listen for. Regular George Noory listeners and former X-Filer’s DO know what to listen for . . . or so they think. And Noory, despite being a very genial and rational host, is not discouraging such speculation.
Ever since I was a kid I’ve been a space exploration buff, so I have read up lately on the various issues behind the Constellation mission (which consists of two planned rockets, the Ares 1 and the Ares 5, along with the Orion manned space capsule and the Altair Moon lander). A lot of smart people were saying that the Ares development project was turning into a boondoggle, despite a successful initial launching of a scaled-down test version back in October. They cited cost over-runs, big delays, fixation on old technology from the 1960s Saturn-Apollo program, and dangers of instability due to some unique design features to the Ares (they call it “the stick” because it is long and very narrow on the bottom half; it uses a single solid-fuel booster to get going, the first manned rocket ever to rely solely on a solid propellant in the dangerous initial phase of flight). The “Augustine Report” which explains Obama’s new direction for NASA cites these factors, not surprisingly.
I am not sure whether I completely agree; the Ares does have a vocal support contingency, including former NASA director Mike Griffin. But I certainly wasn’t surprised by the Augustine – Obama announcement.
However, I was a bit surprised that the conspiracy theory crowd had latched onto the cancellation so quickly, and managed to work it so seamlessly into their sleep-deprived visions. As I lay awake in bed for the balance of the night, I couldn’t help but be a bit amazed. The paranoia movement in America is perhaps bigger than you would initially think. But you have to get up at an ungodly hour and remember to tune in on your AM radio to catch up with it.
The interesting thing about paranoia is that once it gets growing, it spreads like kudzu. While doing a web search on Google today, I found some sites that suspect that Noory himself is part of some kind of conspiracy. They cite the fact that Noory’s family is from the Middle East, and that he generally avoids discussing and criticizing the most apparent form of dangerous conspiracy threatening the USA today, i.e. Islamic radical terrorism. So, just who is he working for? Is he purposely trying to divert right-wing attention from al-Qaeda? Or even better: is al-Qaeda working with the “New World Order” in its quest to take over the world? Is al-Qaeda really just the henchmen for something much more shadowy and powerful? If so, then is Noory diverting just enough attention towards the true forces behind the dangers facing America today (knowing that the majority of people still don’t take him and his loyal listeners seriously), and away from those who are actually (and unsuspectingly) carrying out their will?
Yes, once paranoia gets going, everything and everyone is fair game. You can’t trust anyone! I wish George Noory and his radio show well, but I hope that he realizes that he’s playing with fire, a fire of distrust that corrupts society and politics.
P.S., today I heard a high-up in the government agency that I work for make a speech, where she cited a popular recent book on reforming government, called “If We Can Put A Man On The Moon”. The idea behind this book is that if a government could get a man on the moon back in the sixties, there’s no reason why government can’t pull up its socks and address the complex problems of today. For a moment I thought about raising my hand and asking her what she thought about Obama’s recent cancellation of the latest attempt at putting a man on the moon, given that it was going awry. Is “yes we can” turning into “no we can’t”? But then I remembered that I need the paycheck, so I let the temptation pass. Thank goodness that my insomnia didn’t get the best of my workday judgment there!
Jim,
Wow! I can’t help but be amazed at the massive mixing (of how many?) different topics all “baked” together in one pie. I find myself asking is it just the people of particular time that are able to do this? Is there some particular feature of the present time that lies at the bottom of this massive mixture of ingredients?
I must comment on the various ingredients individually as I see them:
1) How did the paranormal get into this discussion? I must say that I too have noticed a strange return of fascination (is that the word here?) with the paranormal—even going so far as to have the Animal Planet channel showing programs about the paranormal goings on here and there. I confess I haven’t paid too much attention as I don’t get why the Animal Planet, which has had some beautiful programs on nature, would be showing programs on the paranormal. I always wonder when I see these paranormal shows/movies: Why must they always take place in the dark? Are ghosts (if they exist) unable to manifest themselves in the dark? I tend to doubt it. If the paranormal people want to measure some form of energy, why must it always be in the dark? Why can’t they measure the same thing when it’s light out? Just asking.
2) How did alien abduction get involved in all this? As far back as the mid-1960s I went through my “alien abduction” period. In fact, I still keep a copy of “A Canticle for Leibowitz” by Walter Miller and “The Interrupted Journey” (the story of Betty and Barney Miller) by John Fuller on my bookshelf for purely sentimental reasons. That period went on for several years when I read everything on the market about alien abduction. In the end it always seemed to me that there was a real question of whether alien abductions actually took place as described (in all its fearful horror for the people involved) or whether such abductions were more a product of the individuals’ psyche and/or unconscious fueled by some sort of collective unconscious connection. In the end I came to this conclusion (how many years ago?): Who was actually to say that there were not “higher” beings of some sort that have evolved to such a level that we are to them as rabbits, dogs, chimps, etc., are to us? I guess such a situation could exist in the universe. Who am I to say? However, I always wondered about the underlying (subconscious/unconscious) aspect of this phenomenon.
And I must say that every single point the “alien abduction” people make was made some fifty-five years ago; nothing new there.
3) Now it seems this period of time has brought about a strange mixture of the above two psychological phenomenon (is that the appropriate expression here?) with the hard scientific: NASA going to Mars. I must say that it seems to me that Obama has some really good reasons for canceling the Mars program. Everybody else in the nation seems to have to cut back seriously in what it is they want to do/have in their lives. Why not have the Federal Government do the same with a program that would eat up a lot of money and that would, while interesting and obviously useful to mankind in general in the long run, not be of immediate import? Isn’t that what we are all doing in our own lives? Why exclude the Federal Government—which in the end always boils down to “us” anyway—as it is taxes that pay for such programs?
(Continued below)
MCS
Comment by MCS — February 4, 2010 @ 12:27 pm
(Continued from above)
4) As to the paranoia issue: I find myself asking just how is it that so many people are so anxiety laden? I use the word “anxiety” here deliberately as “anxiety” is generally meant to be (at least in psychological terms) a fear that has no real basis in fact. Is it just me or does it seem that this paranoia is running amuck in some areas? I really don’t mean to bring up a race issue, but I simply must: I find myself asking are people THAT afraid of having a Black president that they have become so anxiety laden that the paranoia is overflowing among some groups? Or is there some other psychological impulse driving this group? Is their fear of change and/or insecurity in their lives fueling this anxiety? I do not have an answer. But I wonder about these things.
Lastly, some comments on specific paragraphs you wrote:
I must say you have done an excellent evaluation of cost overruns, etc., in your paragraph about why the space program should be cancelled.
Your paragraph about Noory himself being part of a larger conspiracy is perfect!
And your point about not raising your hand about “yes, we can” turning into “no, we can’t” is well put. Best one keep one’s thoughts to oneself at that point.
And I am still amazed at the mix-mash of separate topics that some fifty years ago were just that—separate topics and have today become one big pot of “leftovers” from other times. I find myself thinking that today we look back on the Middle Ages and the Renaissance and say how uninformed and superstitious people were in those times—they actually believed in things like witchcraft and related ideas…… Yet here we are today: Have we advanced much further when it gets right down to it? Then again, perhaps this whole absolutely “fuzzy thinking” is due simply (?) to the fact that illiteracy is rampant in the land? Again, just asking.
MCS
Comment by MCS — February 4, 2010 @ 12:27 pm