The other day, I came across this article in the NY Times regarding cancer. Actually, I’ve been reading articles about cancer every since 1975 or so. There have been all sorts of promising leads reported in the Times over the years regarding this terrible disease. But they never turn out to be the “magic bullet” that can stop cancer, or even make it a manageable (if unpleasant) chronic condition like diabetes. There’s still something about cancer that the doctors aren’t seeing.
Medicine has had it’s best success against conditions that have one clearly identifiable cause, like a specific germ or toxin that the body is exposed to. The doctors also do OK when one particular body part is broken and can be fixed with a knife (or laser, now) and some thread. Or when a pipe in the body gets clogged and needs to be cleaned out. Doctors are at their best in those instances. They have built their institutions and procedures around these kinds of situations. This is the way that doctors think; i.e., there’s one cause, and once I identify it, I will prescribe a treatment. Next case. Admittedly, doctors have saved a lot of lives and made a lot of peoples’ lives less miserable doing this.
Unfortunately, their “one main factor” approach seems to have its limits. One small but common example is backache. Fortunately, I don’t have back problems. But those who do tell me that it’s a lifetime thing, and that doctors seem kind-of lost in dealing with it (even though they bravely pretend that they know just what is happening and what should be done). Backache is a complex, systemic condition involving a lot of dynamic interactions between body, mind and environment. And doctors don’t understand complex dynamic system interactions all that well. They don’t like chaotic processes. They were taught that the body has plenty of complex things going on inside it, but that those things happen in a deterministic fashion. They weren’t prepared for chaos and complexity.
Fortunately, over the past 20 years, a variety of mathematicians, computer experts and other eclectic scientists have put much time into studying the nature of chaos and complexity itself. And they are now coming up with some really interesting insights on how complex, highly interdependent systems operate. These insights apply across a wide range of phenomenon – the stock market, the weather, the banking system, the highway network, ant colonies, galaxies – and yes, the human body. Most scientific and social service fields are now starting to welcome the insights that this new area of study can provide. I suspect that medicine is having a hard time with it, however.
But from the looks of this article, some medical types are [FINALLY] starting to think about cancer in a systemic fashion. They are finally starting to look at the body and what happens to it in a broader sense, including the germs it gets exposed to, the injuries and shocks it sustains, the food and liquids that it takes in, and even (maybe) the psychological stuff that it experiences. They are finally starting to think about the genesis and development of cancer in terms of the complex interactions between all of these things, along with the body’s plumbing and cells and chemistry.
This article does not mention chaos theory or complexity and emergence by name. But it’s right on the verge. It’s the next logical step. I’m thus a bit more hopeful that medical people will learn to start thinking outside of their very boxy mental boxes. Just getting a grasp on the immune system itself will take a lot of computer modeling and complex system oversight. And cancer isn’t going down if we don’t get a grasp on the immune system.
It’s still going to be a long journey, and I’m no longer hopeful that medicine will come to control cancer in my lifetime. BUT, perhaps they finally are getting on the right track, even though it requires a bit of humility within an institution that isn’t famous for that. Perhaps doctors and medical researchers are finally admitting that they need help, that they need a new way of looking at things like cancer.
If that turns out to be the case, then perhaps there is some reason for real hope as we once again turn the calendar and start another new year. Have a happy!
Jim,
It seems you have covered all the physical aspects of looking for a cure for cancer that have not been considered by doctors.
However, one thing I see left out is a consideration of the intangible aspects of a person and his/her body. Or some may call it the "spiritual" aspects of a person, the "soul", or some other similar name. Some call it considering the "whole" person. Whatever name one chooses to call it, I simply do not think that, when it comes to ANY illness at all, one can simply consider the physical aspects of the person. One must consider the "whole" person–or the intangible, spiritual aspects of the individual.
So I'd say one must add even further to the complexity of how to "save" the individual from various physical ailments and consider the intangible aspect of the individual too.
MCS
Comment by MCS — January 1, 2010 @ 11:53 am
In the 1950's when 'miracle drugs' were knocking down diseases left and right the medical profession became very optimistic that it could probably cure most disease by 2000 or 2100. With the rise of emerging infectious diseases that had been previously unknown such as Legionnaire's, AIDS, Ebola,(etc.), and the simpler ailments that had previously been thought cured evolving resistance (during the 70's and 80's and into our days), that optimism has been badly shaken. The latest paradigm that Doctor's have put their faith in to battle all of this is of course Genetics.
I wonder how long this faith will last though. I just don't believe that this will be the cure for everything. I think the old optimism of curing everything has returned in that sense and it may have to be knocked down again either by chaotic systems that can't be predicted evolving into patterns that are unanticipated or just normal evolution of microbes throwing curves at researchers that they didn't expect.
Will the Medical Arts be the same 100, 200, 500 years from now? Will they still be battling against new things? (Klingon Measles! :-D) Or will our species master biology to the point where we can control these systems with predictability?
I know I won't live long enough to see what happens but it is definitely an interesting and engrossing subject. For a few years in the early 'noughts I spent my time reading books about the threat from new diseases and bio-warfare, but I've kind of burned myself out on the subject. I could recommend a few books if your interested, but I'm pretty sure you are like me, with an ever growing list of books you are going to get to some day that grows faster than you can read them. :-D
Cheers and Happy New Year!
Comment by Will Doohan — January 2, 2010 @ 11:17 pm