The ramblings of an Eternal Student of Life     
. . . still studying and learning how to be grateful and make the best of it
 
 
Monday, May 25, 2009
Brain / Mind ... Society ...

I just started reading another book on the mysteries of the brain and mind: “How Brains Make Up Their Minds” by Walter J. Freeman (not to be confused with Walter Freeman the lobotomy doctor). I’m only about 20 pages into it, but I already came across two lines that seem too good not to share. In chapter 2, Dr. Freeman discusses the meaning of meaningfulness (that’s about the best way to sum it up!). The first quote doesn’t sound all that interesting, but when you mix it with the second quote, you get something worth pondering — sort of like nitric acid and glycerin combining to make nitroglycerin. So here we go with quote 1:

“Meaning is closed from the outside by virtue of its very uniqueness and complexity. In this sense, it resembles the immunological incompatibility of tissues . . . “

I.e., what “means something” to you won’t necessarily take root in my mind; just as my body would likely reject transplanted tissue from your body.

Given that, here’s a second quote to ponder:

“Much of the effort and energy of our lifetimes is spent in trying to understand the meanings of others and to induce others to understand our own.”

 »  continue reading …

◊   posted by Jim G @ 9:51 am       Read Comments (2) / Leave a Comment
 
 
Friday, May 22, 2009
Economics/Business ... Society ...

It’s starting to look as though our nation’s economy is bottoming out; the big drop in economic activity is abating. Things are bumping along the bottom right now. Perhaps by mid autumn there will be sure signs of renewed economic growth; unfortunately, those first signs will not include higher wages and increased employment. That trend won’t start until sometime in 2010.

We’ve just gone through the biggest economic drop relative since the 1930s. It wasn’t expected, it came on suddenly, and has done a lot of damage that will take much time and many resources to fix.

The big lesson, I think, is that real estate bubbles are nasty things; and maybe that’s because real estate ownership itself can be a nasty thing, despite all the myths about how good it is for average Americans to own real estate. America got into a serious real estate bubble sometime around 2002 (although there had been smaller bubbles in the 1980s due to Baby Boom demand), not long after the internet bubble burst. When the internet bubble burst in 2000, it didn’t do all that much damage; the big stock market run-up from 1995 came to an end, but unemployment hardly rose and Americans continued their vigorous consumer spending.

By contrast, the breaking of the real estate bubble has been vicious. Many major financial institutions collapsed or required massive taxpayer bailouts; banks stopped lending; unemployment rose; consumers stopped consuming; two thirds of the American auto industry collapsed; unemployment shot up, and the government has borrowed billions of dollars (on top of the trillions it already owes), which will weigh down the economy for at least a decade. And the whole situation reverberated internationally, amplifying the whole thing. Our government economic leaders (Bernacke, Paulson, Geitner, etc.) reacted quickly and hopefully stopped the bleeding in time. But the patient is still weak, and recovery is going to take a long time. That’s about where we are right now.

So what is the difference between real estate speculation and other kinds of speculation (such as the internet company craze of the 1990s, or the tulip craze of the 1630s)? That is a key question for economists and policy makers of the future. I believe that the key difference is that most other bubbles, especially technology bubbles, leave something behind that continues to help the economy. E.g., better technology. Even the tulip bubble left the world with something good – more tulips!

By contrast, a real estate bubble, along with all the crazy financial machinations that prop it up (currently known as “toxic assets” and “default swaps”), don’t leave you with much. There’s only so much usable land on the planet, even less in the places that economically count the most (i.e., the American suburbs). There have been some expansions of usable real estate over the past 5 or 6 years as roads and infrastructure were built to open up formerly unused lands, e.g. in the Arizona desert or the Florida swamps or the foothills of eastern Pennsylvania. But opening up new property takes time, and bubbles usually don’t give the economy enough time to significantly expand its usable land inventory. For the most part, bubble money is simply chasing what is already in place. And when it blows, much of the new stuff that was built deteriorates quickly (e.g., foreclosed properties deteriorate quickly and are subject to fires). And since the new lands that were opened were done quickly (by “fast-money” developers), they will probably have negative ecological consequences in coming years.

Personally, I’ve always had mixed feelings about real estate, even though the nation as a whole seems to have a love affair with it. I never owned any real estate, and hope not to. It can bring out the best in people (e.g., homeowners who put a lot of sweat and communal effort into maintaining a livable neighborhood), but it also brings out the worst (e.g., NIMBY activism, ethnic divisions about who is or isn’t welcome in the neighborhood, etc.). Nonetheless, real estate ownership is a key component of “the American Dream”; it has gained mythical status. To be considered a successful, responsible American, you have to own real estate; this line of thinking goes all the way back to the “Founding Fathers”. Thus, a huge industry has built up around real estate, which has been further inflated with all kinds of government subsides (e.g. tax deductions for mortgage interest, special government-sponsored institutions to facilitate mortgage credit such as Freddie and Fannie, etc.).

Now America is seeing that perhaps real estate is NOT so innocent, after all; perhaps it should not be up there with motherhood and apple pie. Lots of “dippy urban-planner types” had been complaining for many years about the environmental evils of “suburban sprawl”. They cried, mostly unheard, about the consequences of replacing natural forests and meadows with low-density exurban developments where everyone has to drive for miles just to buy bread and milk and get the kids to school, and where most of that driving is done with gas-guzzling SUV’s needed to get through the snowy winter weather. These dippy sprawl-opponents were ignored over the past 20 years by Republican politicians and well-intended families seeking their stake in “the dream”.

But now, it almost appears that Mother Nature has struck back, perhaps disguised by declining property values, collateralized debt obligations, subprime mortgages, and spiking gasoline prices. The “dippy urban planners” complaining about sprawl were right that something bad would eventually happen, but wrong in concentrating on declining water tables and vanishing bird species. Too bad that they didn’t foresee the consequences of real estate greed poisoning the human spirit; and the concomitant effects of greed and over-taxed earthly resources on the human economy. The real-estate based American dream has thus become a nightmare.

Our economy is going to recover, albeit slowly. So this was a warning, a serious warning. Let’s hope that our nation will learn to become a bit more circumspect in its love affair with real estate. Warnings like this usually mean that the next offense could be a game-changer, a game-ender for America as we know it.

◊   posted by Jim G @ 4:46 pm       Read Comments (2) / Leave a Comment
 
 
Sunday, May 17, 2009
Current Affairs ... Politics ...

OK, just two minor points for today.

1.) I must admit that I’m generally impressed with Barack Obama thus far. I don’t agree with 100% of his policies and actions to date, but it’s becoming clear that he is quite intelligent AND politically skilled. A smart guy who knows how to use it. I believe that he is inspired by the fearful responsibility that he was given, and will generally try to do what is best for the nation; I think he is becoming what you could call a “patriot”, and not just another scheming, posturing politician e.g. Pelosi and Specter.

I do wonder, though, about Obama’s relative youth. I wonder if he is overestimating the power of his position and of the system that he is there to direct. He is moving to take on all of the big problems at once; global warming, education, economic recovery, the financial system, the auto industry, health insurance, energy supply, terrorism, Iraq, Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan, North Korea, Russia, etc. And he’s right that everything is inter-related; you really can’t separate out any of these situations. Still, I wonder what Harry Truman might say if he could be in the White House today. I suspect it might be something like this: “there’s a lot for us to do, and we can’t ignore any part of it, like the previous Administration was doing. But by the same token, we can’t solve it all at once; we’re gonna have to set some priorities as to how and when we tackle these situations”. Yea, a bit of Missouri plain talk might be refreshing right about now.

2.) I haven’t seen the new Star Trek movie yet, but it’s heartening for an old guy like me to know that young people today are getting interested in the Trek concept once more, just as the geeks within my generation did about 40 years ago.  »  continue reading …

◊   posted by Jim G @ 12:04 pm       Read Comments (2) / Leave a Comment
 
 
Thursday, May 14, 2009
Brain / Mind ...

Memory experiment: I had a slow day at work recently, so I Googled around for a while and eventually found a video for an interesting old TV show from 1966. The show is called “The Nowhere Affair”, an episode from NBC’s “Man From U.N.C.L.E.” series, which I saw as a kid and vaguely remembered many years later because of the philosophical implications of its closing scene. (Man From UNCLE was part of the spy show craze that followed the first 007 movies in the mid-60s).

What stuck in my memory about “Nowhere Affair” was the repartee during the closing scenes between UNCLE agent Napoleon Solo (Robert Vaughn) and a woman who was somehow involved in a recent battle between UNCLE and the evil forces of THRUSH. I recalled that the plot involved a desolate town in Nevada called “Nowhere”, the site of an underground THRUSH complex . This site became a “former site” by episode’s end; Solo and his partner, agent Ilya Kuriaken (David McCallum), had of course managed to take down the place. I couldn’t remember exactly how this was done or what the woman’s role was in the process, but I did recall that she had lost her memory. (Ah! How appropriate to this test of my own memory!). I only remember seeing this episode once, when it aired during prime time in 1966; perhaps I might have seen a re-run of it in 1967, but after that I am quite sure that I never saw it again. Until now.

According to my 42 year old memory regarding this UNCLE episode, Solo and Kuryakin were sitting together somewhere after accomplishing their mission of taking THRUSH out of “Nowhere”.  »  continue reading …

◊   posted by Jim G @ 8:41 pm       Read Comments (2) / Leave a Comment
 
 
Sunday, May 10, 2009
Photo ...

PHOTO TIME: Time once again to replace my usual thousand words with one picture. Here’s a shot taken last night, a warm Saturday night in May, at the Eagle Rock Park / 9-11 Memorial in Montclair, NJ. That would be mid-town Manhattan in the distance. I’m tempted to ramble on about the meta-themes that intermix in this shot. But for now, I’ll just let the picture do the talking.

◊   posted by Jim G @ 10:35 am       Read Comments (2) / Leave a Comment
 
 
Saturday, May 9, 2009
Politics ... Public Policy ...

The blog world (and now the Twitter world) seems to value brevity. Obviously, I don’t. But today I will offer a brief thought, perhaps out of laziness. My brief thought for today is a follow up from my blog a few days ago regarding George McGovern’s semi-conservative reboot. As an older guy, McGovern has come to question whether big government is always a good thing. His life experiences following the demise of his political career during the Reagan Revolution taught him to question the doctrinaire liberalism that he so ardently fought for in the Senate and as a Presidential candidate in 1972. I.e., that government is always good and more government is better; and that big government control of the economy is the sine qua non of a just and humane society.

Now McGovern is saying that big government, even American constitutional big government, actually does have its downsides. Thus, perhaps we have to trade off some injustice and inhumanity so as to preserve and foster the long-term benefits of a free society. Conservatives say that big government can’t enforce humane-ness and justice; in doing so, government itself can become inhumane and unjust (this has happened a bit too often during the history of civilization). They believe that the only path to a just society is via the underlying VALUES of a society. You can’t force people to have the right values using big government; you can only hope that they somehow adopt the right ones through societal traditions, e.g. via religious institutions and property ownership. Conservatives (well, the more intelligent ones, anyway; not that Bush crowd) say that the founders of our nation assumed this, and they actually have a good point there. As Madison said, “To suppose that any form of government will secure liberty or happiness without any virtue in the people, is a chimerical idea.”

Well, I myself don’t see this as a complete “either / or” situation. In a just society  »  continue reading …

◊   posted by Jim G @ 6:53 pm       No Comments Yet / Leave a Comment
 
 
Thursday, May 7, 2009
Politics ... Public Policy ...

It’s always refreshing to read about a man who reconsiders and challenges some of his own political views as he matures, in search of a greater truth. The world is not a simple place; politics tries to over-simplify the world in order to gain a certain end. Too often, political ends are served by means of twisting the truth. George McGovern, perhaps the most liberal presidential candidate of the past 80 years or so (lost to Nixon in a landslide in 1972), is trying to revive some of the greater truths. He has recently published three articles in the Wall Street Journal (of all places), which challenge doctrinaire liberal views (just when those views have come back into vogue thanks to Barack Obama).

Obviously the WSJ published these articles because they support its pro-business agenda. Has McGovern become a reactionary fascist in his old age?  »  continue reading …

◊   posted by Jim G @ 8:57 pm       Read Comments (2) / Leave a Comment
 
 
Sunday, May 3, 2009
Current Affairs ... Society ...

The Mexican swine flu, which scared the jeebers out of millions of people, doesn’t seem so scary after all. It’s starting to look like your run-of-the-mill flu. It got off to a nasty start in Mexico, but that may be because a lot of people there avoid or have trouble getting to a doctor. There’s still a lot of folk medicine going on in those little villages. So, the American supermarkets and drug stores may soon be able to restock their shelves with anti-microbial hand lotion and face masks. As a sidebar, this reminds me of the run on duct tape a few years ago, after the government released a report about how to survive if a terrorist releases radiation or deadly germs near your home. (I.e., the report said to tape big sheets of plastic around your windows and doors.)

There’s another little side-bar going on in the liberal blogosphere right now about the pig farm in Mexico where the current swine flu might have originated. (I can’t say whether this side-issue is also happening on in the twitter-osphere; the attention spans there are probably too short for it.) Some reporters and Mexican officials are tracing the new flu to a village named La Gloria, which is near an industrial food production farm run by Smithfield Foods – yes, an American corporation that produces and sells pork. Actually, Smithfield Foods is the largest pork producer in the world. Smithfield denies that their pigs were involved, saying that they are clean — none of them showed any signs of having the latest flu strain. Of course, you’ve got to wonder just how thoroughly they looked and tested; and whether the local health officials were willing to risk angering the gringo outfit that probably comprises 90% of the local job market and economy.

Personally, I don’t seek to blame Smithfield Foods alone for the flu; they’re probably running their pig farms like most any other industrial pig farm, no better and no worse. Who I do blame is us, we Americans who can’t think outside the box about our diets. I am a former meat-eater who became a vegetarian about 15 years ago, and over time I’ve seen more and more evidence of the stress that meat consumption places upon the world. Meat consumption today is big business, a product of international corporations which grow, process and serve most of the meat eaten in America and in other developed nations. The stress from it includes poorer health in old age and the resulting burden on medical resources (reflected in soaring health care and Medicare costs); and increased energy use (fuels needed for growing animals, transporting them and refrigerating them) and the global warming greenhouse gases they produce. It’s a bit harder to get fat on a balanced vegetarian diet; and grains, beans and veggies certainly use less fuel and have a smaller “carbon footprint” per calorie consumed. And now, it’s starting to look as though ham and bacon and spare ribs encourage the development of super-bugs that could take down a whole lot of people.

Why is this? Modern pig farms, like any other kind of industrial food-animal facility, try to maximize their efficiency by jamming animals as close together as possible. Also, pigs have genetic DNA structures that in certain ways are closer to human genetic structures than with most other animals (hmm, what does that say about us???). A whole bunch of pigs jammed together, tended by low-paid human workers who may not have such good sanitary habits, become a central hub for infectious diseases that could affect humans. They present a lot of opportunity for viruses to do what they do naturally — i.e., mutate, change their own genetic codes a bit. So you have all these pigs exchanging germs with humans and each other, each pig incubating millions and millions of different types of germs. This gives these germs new chances to develop even more variations, which affect their ease of transmission and what they can do to you once they reach you. Most of these virus variations are failures; they die off quickly. But every so often, by luck of the draw, a new combination occurs that can spread easily and can do some real damage to humans.

If you had a pig in the forest who developed this new super-bug, it probably wouldn’t get far. But a pig jammed together with hundreds or thousands of other pigs will almost assuredly spread it to the other pigs, who in turn will then spread it to the humans who tend them (or who live near-by in villages like La Gloria, possibly by insects). Oh, and another thing — pigs crammed together in farms also interact with birds, and we know that birds are also pretty good at developing flu viruses that can affect humans. The pig farms can’t keep birds from landing near their pigs (or roosting in their living areas) and depositing their droppings so that pigs can breath or ingest the more successful avian germs strains. Well, that’s another head-start that these pigs get in developing germs that can really knock human beings for a loop.

It’s kind of like having a house with a door that opens with a six-digit code number. Every day you punch in six numbers on the door panel, and if use the right code, it lets you in. You set the code number, which can be any number from 000000 to 999999; i.e., there are one million possible number combinations. Let’s say that there’s a bad guy in the neighborhood who wants to get into your home and rob everything and then kill you during the night. The house is pretty secure, and the only way the robber can get in is to punch in the right code number. Let’s also say that the robber only gets one chance each night to punch in one number; he doesn’t know the number, so he guesses. And he’s very persistent; he keeps coming back each night, trying another number.

If we assume that he has no idea about what number you would use, nor whether you would use some kind of pattern (like 212121) or just select a number randomly (like 598830, perhaps), then on average it will take him 500,000 nights to come up with the right code. Let’s see, that’s 1,369 years. I’m not a good math guy, but you could also come up with probability bands, e.g. something like a 90% chance that it will take him at least 100 years, etc. (Not sure of the exact number, but it would be something like that). Obviously, there’s only a one-in-a-million chance that he will finally break in and kill you on any given night. So you decide, OK, I can live with that.

But let’s say that things change, so that the robber can try out a whole lot of numbers every night; then his chances get better and better. And let’s say that he also gets some info about you, on what kind of number you might select. Based on your past decisions, he knows that you are likely to use a subtle pattern in the numbers, e.g. 791827 (the second, fourth and sixth number are in descending order). Say that the bad guy figures out what that pattern is, and is smart enough to use it to narrow down the list of possible numbers. Now this robber is a whole lot more dangerous. That’s the difference between a thousand pigs wandering around in a forest, occasionally being hunted and eaten by a human, and a thousand pigs jammed together in an industrial factory-farm in a third-world country. Viruses have a much better chance with such a pig farm of finding the right code to “break in and rob the human house”. The odds are being stacked in their favor.

So perhaps we got off light this time. The birds, pigs and people in Mexico have cooked up (thru the enhanced trial-and-error process going on at pig factories such as Smithfield Foods) another new virus, which has some “legs”. It has the right “code” to spread around in people; but it doesn’t have the punch to do more-than-average damage. In reality, humans are like a house with more than one door and door code; the robber (virus) might figure out the code to get in thru the outside door, but might not get the code to the master bedroom where you sleep. Thus you won’t be killed. BUT, with pig farms giving these “robbers” more and more chances and more head-starts regarding information structures (from the viruses they exchange with humans and birds), sooner or later a really deadly virus will emerge.

That’s the trade off for those delicious spare ribs at Chili’s or that affordable Easter ham from the local supermarket or that bacon / ham McMuffin at Mickey D’s. Don’t blame us vegetarians when the big avian-pig-human virus finally does come knocking at your door.

◊   posted by Jim G @ 11:19 am       Read Comments (2) / Leave a Comment
 
 
Wednesday, April 29, 2009
Current Affairs ... Politics ...

Tonight I just have three quick thoughts to offer. First off, kudos to President Obama for his commitment to increase government funding for scientific research, made in an address this past Monday to the National Academy of Sciences. President Obama is increasing the government’s role and the government’s cost quite radically, and the only way for such spending levels to be sustained without triggering a taxpayer revolt is to grow the economy. Scientific research is a good long-term investment to support such growth, something that pays for itself many times over. So, good move, Mr. Obama. I also like his proposal on developing a fast train network; that can also help meet the goal of stimulating economic growth while cutting down on energy use and carbon emissions.

Second, regarding Senator Arlen Specter’s conversions to the Democrats: that certainly was NOT a profile in political courage. Specter is pretty much just a rat jumping off a sinking ship. I’d have much more respect for the man if he had stayed in the Republican Party and had taken his lumps (i.e., getting beat in the upcoming GOP primary in Pennsylvania), and at the same time devoting himself towards moving the Republicans back towards a more centrist position. He would have done the nation more good that way.

The Republicans seem mostly interested in pursuing the niche agendas being put forth by the party’s conservative rump. That cost them dearly in the last election, and may cost them even more dearly over the next 4 or 8 years. Eventually, the moderates will win out and the GOP will start singing a different tune, a tune that admits the importance of most Democratic priorities (e.g. health care, global warming, energy independence, education, poverty) but proposes “lighter government” solutions. If Spector had the bravery and foresight to have affiliated himself with the younger Republicans who are beginning to question the failed Reagan / Bush paradigms, if he committed himself to providing mentorship and support for a new generation, I would have taken my hat off to him. But no, that just wasn’t Arlen Specter. As to the Democrats: when you bring a dog with fleas into your house, you know what happens.

Finally, just a note about Twitter, currently the rage on the Internet. I don’t pay much attention to it, but I do agree with other commentators that it reflects many of the worst things about the net and about modern life in general. I.e., extremely short attention spans and thinking horizons. Maureen Dowd of the NY Times recently took time off from her on-going love letters to Barack (and hate letters to his critics), to interview Biz Stone, the founder of Twitter. It’s a great article, where Ms. Dowd artfully and humorously shows just how wonderful it is not to be restricted to bleeps of under 140 characters. And today, I heard on the radio that around 60% of people who register with Twitter quit within one month. But hey, that’s what happens when you cultivate your customer base among people who don’t have much patience. What you planteth, you eventually soweth.

As to swine flu — let’s just hope that it turns out to be not so bad after all, at least for a relatively well-off population having the benefit of good public health measures and modern health care. Of course, the fact that increasing numbers of Americans don’t have affordable access to modern health care is not a positive factor. Let’s hope that a relevant benefit of universal health care — i.e. the ability to better control an unfolding epidemic and avoid what Mexico is already going thru with swine flu — will NOT be grimly illuminated because of this disease.

◊   posted by Jim G @ 9:16 pm       Read Comments (2) / Leave a Comment
 
 
Sunday, April 26, 2009
Photo ...

Here’s something you don’t see too much. It’s a check from the US Government — an unexpected check at that. I do my own taxes, and I filed early this year, well before April 15. About a week ago I got a note in the mail from the IRS saying that I made a mistake on my return. Bad news, right? Well, for once, it was good news. Turns out that I forgot that the stimulus tax payment from last summer was to be based on what you earned in 2008, even though the initial amount sent was based on what you earned in 2007. Because of some income on stock investments that I’m holding for retirement (above what I can put in an IRA), my 2007 income was too high for me to get the full $600; I was sent $500. HOWEVER, because the stock market went to hell in 2008 and I didn’t have any such income, I actually am owed the full amount. But I wasn’t aware of that. So the IRS was decent enough to remind me of my mistake, and sent me a check for what they owed me.

Well, that’s certainly a rare event in life — making a mistake such that the IRS owes YOU money, and then getting a check in a couple of weeks. Well, no tea party for me this year. It’s nice to see the IRS being just as prompt in correcting a mistake in one’s own favor, as it is in going after you when you owe them money (or if they think you do). I’m actually being nice to Uncle Sam and not rushing to the bank to cash the check. As such, I’m helping in a small way to finance the huge defecit that the federal government is now incurring as to help save the economy from a decade-long depression. But once I do put the money in the bank, most of it will stay there. I’m afraid that an extra hundred isn’t going to inspire me to get out there and contribute to the revival of the consumer spending sector. I have a furlough at work to deal with; I thus can use the money to help soften the impact on my basic spending (and preparing just in case my employment situation gets even worse).

Nonetheless, I just wanted to give some non-financial credit where non-financial credit is deserved. Thanks much, IRS.

◊   posted by Jim G @ 8:24 pm       Read Comments (2) / Leave a Comment
 
 
TOP PAGE - LATEST BLOG POSTS
« PREVIOUS PAGE -- NEXT PAGE (OLDER POSTS) »
FOR MORE OF MY THOUGHTS, CHECK OUT THE SIDEBAR / ARCHIVES
To blog is human, to read someone's blog, divine
NEED TO WRITE ME? eternalstudent404 (thing above the 2) gmail (thing under the >) com

www.jimgworld.com - THE SIDEBAR - ABOUT ME - PHOTOS
 
OTHER THOUGHTFUL BLOGS:
 
Church of the Churchless
Clear Mountain Zendo, Montclair
Fr. James S. Behrens, Monastery Photoblog
Of Particular Significance, Dr. Strassler's Physics Blog
Weather Willy, NY Metro Area Weather Analysis
Spunkykitty's new Bunny Hopscotch; an indefatigable Aspie artist and now scholar!

Powered by WordPress